WE are waiting for a decision from the court, not

WE are waiting for a decision from the court, not a settlement from the court to throw out the alice 101 dismissal and restore the validity of our patent.

Duo would be an out of court settlement. We have what we feel is a precedent in the case. That should give the appeal court the info they need to reverse dismissal and uphold our patent.

Once restored, our patent is by all accounts invincible . If anyone want to settle before that overturning , I don't think we would turn them away from giving us money.

All infringers we are negotiating with that were put on hold will settle without a trial or whimper, we want that, as the issue is handing us lots of money.

Any future infringers after dismissal is overturned, that wants to slit their own financial throats with desiring a trial , will be accomodated and lose and pay treble (triple) damages as a willful infringers and also pay for attorney fees for a case that's hopeless. Extra millions for naught. We'll take it!

Armed with a death star ultimate weapon Patent, all infringers will bow and offer to settle out of court giving us money for past use of sfor products and becoming channel partners and paying for future use and not go to trial.

The PTAB panel of judges told Duo Centrify and Vasco or trustwave, that they would not prevail in court. So they were negotiating a settlement.
Not sure if I confused you or clarified anything for you lol
Best!
C J