All of these MMEX claims are easy, trivially so to
Post# of 4466
(Total Views: 271)
Posted On: 12/04/2018 1:45:47 PM
All of these MMEX claims are easy, trivially so to refute:
The road, as documented in MMEX's SEC filing was approximately $210K, grossly over-priced for its width, length, type, and the terrain in which it was constructed, so the carpet-bagging Mad J. over-paid (using "investors" money).
The office is empty, and inexpensive, providing a store-front for Mad J.'s share-selling scheme.
Representative Hurd was in the region on other business, and the MMEX side-show was part of many activities in the Pecos County/Fort Stockton area Hurd participated in.
The groundbreaking ceremony was part of a larger deceptive charade, conducted without having first obtained project financing. Any public support of the MMEX project is presumptive.
The TXDOT/Texas Pacifico work has absolutely nothing to do with MMEX - this is just another delusional example of conflating another organization's success and efforts to cover up MMEX's failures. And that work is far from done, or fully funded.
There is no evidence about PT, other than an unsubstantiated claim in MMEX generated, self-referential PR. MMEX would be unable to structure a material agreement on this matter, because it has no ability to perform, i.e. it cannot manufacture a product, because it has no business operations. Further, straight-run "diesel" can't be marketed for any purpose, other than in a single narrow use, which is declining, if it exists at all - HOBM - and it would require PT to have a separate fleet and facilities.
MMEX is entirely a scam, documented fully in its SEC filings. Those are the facts. This is why MMEX has failed five times to meet commitments to "investors" to obtain project financing - any legitimate capital source easily ascertains MMEX's fraudulent nature.
The road, as documented in MMEX's SEC filing was approximately $210K, grossly over-priced for its width, length, type, and the terrain in which it was constructed, so the carpet-bagging Mad J. over-paid (using "investors" money).
The office is empty, and inexpensive, providing a store-front for Mad J.'s share-selling scheme.
Representative Hurd was in the region on other business, and the MMEX side-show was part of many activities in the Pecos County/Fort Stockton area Hurd participated in.
The groundbreaking ceremony was part of a larger deceptive charade, conducted without having first obtained project financing. Any public support of the MMEX project is presumptive.
The TXDOT/Texas Pacifico work has absolutely nothing to do with MMEX - this is just another delusional example of conflating another organization's success and efforts to cover up MMEX's failures. And that work is far from done, or fully funded.
There is no evidence about PT, other than an unsubstantiated claim in MMEX generated, self-referential PR. MMEX would be unable to structure a material agreement on this matter, because it has no ability to perform, i.e. it cannot manufacture a product, because it has no business operations. Further, straight-run "diesel" can't be marketed for any purpose, other than in a single narrow use, which is declining, if it exists at all - HOBM - and it would require PT to have a separate fleet and facilities.
MMEX is entirely a scam, documented fully in its SEC filings. Those are the facts. This is why MMEX has failed five times to meet commitments to "investors" to obtain project financing - any legitimate capital source easily ascertains MMEX's fraudulent nature.
(0)
(0)