Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Message Board

The overview section further explains whom the pla

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (2)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 436)
Posted On: 11/16/2018 3:48:37 AM
Avatar
Posted By: sox0407
Re: Mo #51165
The overview section further explains whom the plan is for.

Quote:
Under Rule 10b5-1, directors and other major insiders in the company – large shareholders, officers and others who are able to access material nonpublic information (MNPI) – are able to establish a written plan that details when they will be able to buy or sell shares at a predetermined time on a scheduled basis.



I respectfully disagree that Rule 10b5-1 applies to the MFO because they don't have access to MNPI. If I'm the MFO and I read

"provided, however, that the foregoing prohibition shall not apply to sales of shares of the common stock of the Company made pursuant to a valid contract, instruction or plan that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act (a “10b5-1 Plan”),"

I must be wondering why the 10b5-1 Plan is written as a condition because I'm not required to provide such plan when I decide to sell. $2 isn't the point because I'm not arguing whether the plan is valid at this moment. I'm arguing why the plan is written as a condition if it doesn't apply to the MFO.

If the lawyers use the word shorting like in the Aspire agreement, there'll be no dispute in court and we wouldn't had this conversation. I've been told to "stick to science" many times when I speculated Aspire was selling. I can also say the boogeyman theory gets discredited to a certain degree by accepting the MFO is allowed to short. I guess we have to agree to disagree on this topic.


(2)
(0)




Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  


Dont-give-up.jpg




Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us