Sox, In the very first line of the Overview of the

Sox, In the very first line of the Overview of the attached Investopedia definition in your “key witness” 10b5-1 it also includes “major shareholder” which applies to both IPIX insiders and the MFO. Either way the 10b5-1 is a moot point until the share price is over $2 share. Exhibit D does make clear that it applies to both IPIX and to the MFO. I already posted Exhibit D in its entirety on 4 separate posts to you.
In the 8k the very first sentence of Exhibit D it states “between Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and the purchasers signatory thereto

To answer your specific question it does not specifically use the word short but the following appears to be very clear:
“Restriction Period”), the undersigned will not offer, sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction which is designed to, or might reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition (whether by actual disposition or effective economic disposition due to cash settlement or otherwise) by the undersigned or any Affiliate (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) of the undersigned or any person in privity with the undersigned or any Affiliate of the undersigned), directly or indirectly, or establish or increase a put equivalent position or liquidate or decrease a call equivalent position

I doubt the above will change your mind and frankly I really don’t care. I have deep dived into this MFO agreement and I believe it is very clear. I understand you refuse to believe there is a 90 day restriction because without MFO selling or shorting not only does this False Narrative get discredited it also shoots holes in your refusal to believe there are nefarious entities including dishonest Market Makers exaggerating volume with Wash Trades and Short Sellers and Paid Bashers working in concert to cripple IPIX. You have a ring-side seat of this as a moderator at the Swamp with posters like scottsmith, loanranger, The Bunny, MAXAMDUD, Rdunn88, noretreat and many others who have continually bashed IPIX management, trials and drugs for YEARS. Some are bold enough to say that they do not own IPX but “are bored” on large SMB’s and some are bold enough to admit to have many alias’s. Do you believe these are honorable people? I am done fetching your stick. I mentioned in my very first post that you will never admit when you are wrong so find someone else to play contract lawyer fetch with. Go back to what you used to be good at and add value which was posting on the value of IPIX science and market potential of life saving drugs.