Lets debate the proper understanding of the Skull
Post# of 96892
(Total Views: 531)
Posted On: 07/12/2018 10:06:37 AM
Re: SilentPartner #91087
Lets debate the proper understanding of the Skull and Crossbones.
How many of us even knew it existed?
Who among us really understands how it is activated. In our case, we seem to have reached a position with our stock value (and possibly management performance) where the system concludes that NTEK should be barred from making promotional type statements.
How we got into this position should be debatable and it is probably a good thing that we get in front of a judge. With respect to our stock value, hopefully NTEK will finally have an opportunity to present a case regarding Naked Shorting.
If you think the way Alan and I think, naked shorting has been used as a weapon. If I understand things correctly, the real carriers of that weapon are the market makers who possess an exception to rules against naked shorting that is affectionately called the Madoff Rule. I understand that Bernie Madoff argued successfully for that rule on behalf of market makers on the basis that market makers responsibilities include making liquidity in markets.
1. https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2012/02/yes...l-problem/
2. https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2012/07/mad...ked-short/
In addition to supporting my claims regarding the Madoff Rule, these articles summarize the financial violence WS practiced against the rest of the world that stopped us on a dime in 2008....and I have seen nothing that actually deals with market makers and naked shorting.
I believe that the real problem (the problem of size and breadth and the huge number or trades) isn't with market makers using naked shorting to create liquidity...I have read elsewhere that the real problem is that market makers sell this skill to clients that buy for the express purpose of creating a naked short that they may not be able to create on their own.
The problem is that companies that become the victims of this financial violence then become the target...because our BK releases all of criminal WS.
So I'm an insurance agent not a WS employee... disagree with me if you want but tell us who you are also so we can judge your contributions.
Bottom line for us: We bought into a dream...and if you get beyond the bullshit you realize that much of what David said he could do technically he has done...including tearing it all down and redoing it to take advantage of the best new technology on the market today. The evidence is a high quality usable vehicle called Ultraflix.
Paul
How many of us even knew it existed?
Who among us really understands how it is activated. In our case, we seem to have reached a position with our stock value (and possibly management performance) where the system concludes that NTEK should be barred from making promotional type statements.
How we got into this position should be debatable and it is probably a good thing that we get in front of a judge. With respect to our stock value, hopefully NTEK will finally have an opportunity to present a case regarding Naked Shorting.
If you think the way Alan and I think, naked shorting has been used as a weapon. If I understand things correctly, the real carriers of that weapon are the market makers who possess an exception to rules against naked shorting that is affectionately called the Madoff Rule. I understand that Bernie Madoff argued successfully for that rule on behalf of market makers on the basis that market makers responsibilities include making liquidity in markets.
1. https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2012/02/yes...l-problem/
2. https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2012/07/mad...ked-short/
In addition to supporting my claims regarding the Madoff Rule, these articles summarize the financial violence WS practiced against the rest of the world that stopped us on a dime in 2008....and I have seen nothing that actually deals with market makers and naked shorting.
I believe that the real problem (the problem of size and breadth and the huge number or trades) isn't with market makers using naked shorting to create liquidity...I have read elsewhere that the real problem is that market makers sell this skill to clients that buy for the express purpose of creating a naked short that they may not be able to create on their own.
The problem is that companies that become the victims of this financial violence then become the target...because our BK releases all of criminal WS.
So I'm an insurance agent not a WS employee... disagree with me if you want but tell us who you are also so we can judge your contributions.
Bottom line for us: We bought into a dream...and if you get beyond the bullshit you realize that much of what David said he could do technically he has done...including tearing it all down and redoing it to take advantage of the best new technology on the market today. The evidence is a high quality usable vehicle called Ultraflix.
Paul
(12)
(1)