look at my 3 last posts - 1 of which was posted after your post
Besides impatience so common to pennies,most recent posters are laboring under incomplete info or ignorance re the various approaches NNLX is using.
Trading assumes the 11-27-17 mentioned NSF app was filed by dec4 and since we've not heard of an award that that failed and so all is lost. my logic just posted indicated that NSF app will be filed by the new July deadline.
there are at least 3 categories of progress/action
1) internal growth confirmed in updates which eventually will reach the magic net income by itself,growing over 400% yoy in the last posted financials.
2)But as NNLX updates have noted in the last year NNLX is not satisfied by the RELATIVELY slow internal growth-that thinking alone detailed in updates late last year should have longs thrilled bc that thinking is a gamechanger itself
So there are three grant apps now!!!
3). And the new approach to either partner or license or sell the flat pack patent in certain geographic areas including the huge EU and Chinese markets.
thats 3 approaches right there, "partner or license or sell".
License is imo more likely in the short term bc of the difficulty of discounting (determining) future earned income of a new product vs income of the current product used by those companies. Partnerships are more complicated than licensing.
There is no reason to believe that the interest by maybe a dozen parties in 7 or more countries is limited to a response to an email sent by NNLX- i dont know where that idea came from-with that kind of thinking man would not have invented fire yet.
Limited human thinking never fails to amaze me. I'm 50 years ahead of the competition in my many fields of expertise. Science is not one of those fields but logic is and professors would fall out of their chairs and say you understand in minutes what it takes a semester to teach. Science is not even 1 of my top 1000 fields and i dont even have an intuitive understanding of the products since i dont work in a lab and this board is outside of my comfort zone but a few of us were working hard to make this site a viable alternative to the basher boards for the benefit of the many
but i guess just as businessmen and lawyers and scientists all use different languages due to the destructive effects of uber specialization, that must explain why some of the posting businessmen and most of those w scientific bents dont understand NNLX game changing moves in the last year.
but i guess thats what i should expect by those who believe they evolved from an amoeba when the earth never even had a prebiotic soup and even if the earth did the odds against the simplest life form would/ve been 1 in a number so huge( w 24 million zeros) that it would be scientifically impossible.
Besides impatience so common to pennies,most recent posters are laboring under incomplete info or ignorance re the various approaches NNLX is using.
Trading assumes the 11-27-17 mentioned NSF app was filed by dec4 and since we've not heard of an award that that failed and so all is lost. my logic just posted indicated that NSF app will be filed by the new July deadline.
there are at least 3 categories of progress/action
1) internal growth confirmed in updates which eventually will reach the magic net income by itself,growing over 400% yoy in the last posted financials.
2)But as NNLX updates have noted in the last year NNLX is not satisfied by the RELATIVELY slow internal growth-that thinking alone detailed in updates late last year should have longs thrilled bc that thinking is a gamechanger itself
So there are three grant apps now!!!
3). And the new approach to either partner or license or sell the flat pack patent in certain geographic areas including the huge EU and Chinese markets.
thats 3 approaches right there, "partner or license or sell".
License is imo more likely in the short term bc of the difficulty of discounting (determining) future earned income of a new product vs income of the current product used by those companies. Partnerships are more complicated than licensing.
There is no reason to believe that the interest by maybe a dozen parties in 7 or more countries is limited to a response to an email sent by NNLX- i dont know where that idea came from-with that kind of thinking man would not have invented fire yet.
Limited human thinking never fails to amaze me. I'm 50 years ahead of the competition in my many fields of expertise. Science is not one of those fields but logic is and professors would fall out of their chairs and say you understand in minutes what it takes a semester to teach. Science is not even 1 of my top 1000 fields and i dont even have an intuitive understanding of the products since i dont work in a lab and this board is outside of my comfort zone but a few of us were working hard to make this site a viable alternative to the basher boards for the benefit of the many
but i guess just as businessmen and lawyers and scientists all use different languages due to the destructive effects of uber specialization, that must explain why some of the posting businessmen and most of those w scientific bents dont understand NNLX game changing moves in the last year.
but i guess thats what i should expect by those who believe they evolved from an amoeba when the earth never even had a prebiotic soup and even if the earth did the odds against the simplest life form would/ve been 1 in a number so huge( w 24 million zeros) that it would be scientifically impossible.
1
