stockholders, especially penny holders-possess a v

stockholders, especially penny holders-possess a voracious hunger for info-

if pennies only announce what is already completed penny holders rarely are satisfied and would ask-"why didnt the company keep us informed?".
Holders WANT to know the companies plans and every step of those plans. Dammed if they do and dammed if they dont.
So at what point does the company issue updates etc.
At some point between an idea and completion.

Thats what NNLX did. They did dd /investigation re facilities etc and the costs of such etc and then made a plan to carry the product to completion. At that point NNLX informed us of those plans.

However, as I remember later, an unexpected falling pps- probably due to manipulation- the stock story of low pennies-the company either decided it would be punitive to pps to execute those particular plans at that time or it became impossible to do so.
NNLX,apparently aware of the destruction of many pennies via poisonous financing, has chosen to avoid spiraling financing. A clue to the clueless/pretending bashers- low pps penny companies have restricting finances- thats almost a given! That's a major reason for low pps! Besides many pennies don't even yet have a viable product nor the means to secure them-yet without even any equipment or viable way to obtain either many companies announce glorious plans not rooted in reality. NNLX is NOT in that category.

Navigating those financial restrictions can be and often is more difficult than dealing with the product. Bashers love it when companies fall prey to poisonous financing bc that means bashers will greatly profit-including apparently nano/pumpkin reportedly posting here under another alias after having been imo and that of others banned from this board- and often controlling the discussion,with every issue at best out of context, as they did w this issue.

NNLX, foiled by changing pps etc, which made it advisable not to use 1 or more of the expected financing methods,apparently went back to the financial drawing board,as growth in internal revenue alone would apparently be insufficient to meet their expected timelines.

Without poisonous financing w its high spiraling costs, the only direct way for a co to take advantage of being public (to counter the enormous headaches of being public) is to issue new shares,which can be dilutive or not, depending on what a company receives in return for those shares. Bashers seem to have convinced many penny traders that a company receives nothing in exchange for newly issued shares (as if ceo's were throwing shares out of the window on a drunken joyride). A company receives nothing when holders trade their existing shares.

Which should lead to the present narrative -which is ignored by bashers.
NNLX has been very careful re the issuance of new shares. So to avoid poisonous and dilutive etc financing, NNLX has recently introduced 2 new game changers to the financial drawing board:

1) Application to the NSF, via a professional grant writer, for grants which typically total ca 1.5 million for 3 stages

2) an even bolder move- taking concrete steps (see sept/oct? update) to sell patents in certain prescribed geographical areas for possible revenues of 35-50 million!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do the bashers, who bring up the issue of financing,as they did again,even remind readers of the RESULTING TRANSITION TO THE GRANT APPLICATION AND the road to PATENT SALES??? Of course not,that would be too intellectually honest and contextual !!!!!

Btw,advertising for patent sales does not restrict parties from pursuing other arrangements, like licensing. Such alternative arrangements can be subsumed under or be separate from patent sales,the patent sales terminology simply opening the doors for all kinds of discussions w other companies.

Very few companies at this pps would even have a patent, let alone the numerous country/regional patents NNLX has courtesy of their recent patent attorney (with a double medical doctorate) who spent years obtaining such numerous patents. Patent attorneys are, btw, especially outside of NYC or Wash D.C..,very rare. I've communicated w thousands of attorneys across the nation but never had the occasion to speak to a patent attorney-the only specialized attorney outside of the generalized reference of "attorney at law".