So in your perspective, the possible lender would

So in your perspective, the possible lender would rather see the clean break from Crown Bridge in that event, rather then the previous arrangement where Crown bridge could return the put shares and get them "recalculated" ("Purchase Price [of] Put shall be reduced accordingly" )?

That amendment essentially leaves Crown Bridge with no recourse in the event of an RS where previously they could have returned shares and gotten them re-issued?