I will give you that some of that post could have

I will give you that some of that post could have been construed as a violation in and of itself. Since it's too late for me to cut that part out I removed it. But you obviously read it and you understand the point.

I will give you an example. You earlier criticized someone for posting NIO information (which btw the way is in the DDBox as a suspected collaberation, not a confirmed one). You said in your post that NIO is ahead of JBZY in the game. The information that members here have produced suggests instead that they are working with JBZY in using the powerplant.

Now, the proper way to refute that assertion would be to produce links or other proof that NIO is already selling cars, and then also produce the proof that NIO is not using JBZY tech in their car by showing who they are actually using. In that situation I would have to defend you because you proved the earlier claim false. Do you see how this works?

Just coming in here and saying the info someone dug up or their analysis of what it means is garbage because it hasn't been confirmed by the company is what they do in iHub. The cannot substantiate anything as false but continue to claim it is. I'm not going to allow that here.