well PP...I know how hell bent you are on proving
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 292)
Posted On: 12/31/2017 8:29:58 AM
Re: PaperProphet #38488
well PP...I know how hell bent you are on proving JB wrong on the $10/B of oil. OK..let's get beyond that if we could...call it over zealous...exuberance... scam...whatever you wish... ok? And I know you're sitting there with a calculator attempting to guesstimate what's going in vs. what is coming out and the cost per. I get it. Some end product should hold a greater value than what went in...I think we all get it.
And that is where we part ways. You look at it as a simple formula...where ...in reality...the formula is far more complex when the potential adjustments to "A NUMBER" are contingent upon any number of variables PROFITABLE to the process. We don't know what they are...the Government... Feds... State ...Municipal...tax...tipping...use...I mean...the devil's in the details. To claim your simple formula is the true measure of this business, given your self proclaimed business expertise...is really...the scam.
And now, in the face of this impending doom for the naked short position, you are out here getting a feeler out of the longs.....what they plan to do with their shares...if we get a bump. Seriously dude?
For the true longs...I feel for them. I wasn't in it back then... refused.... although I was aware. In reality, I can't be bothered by the naked short position... nothing I can do to control it... it's gonna do what it's going to do.. end of story. But to say naked short selling does not occur ...and there couldn't possibly be one in PTOI... is the scam.
To inquire as to the investing practices of longs/traders while also implying we're being scammed...been lied to...but ....there's a possible bump on the way... please dude... I've given you far too much credit...I bet you're a "short"-haired lap dog.
Quote:
I can see that Mr. Heddle operates on a whole new level and doesn't have to worry about petty issues such as whether or not the processor can transform some material into something of a higher value.
And that is where we part ways. You look at it as a simple formula...where ...in reality...the formula is far more complex when the potential adjustments to "A NUMBER" are contingent upon any number of variables PROFITABLE to the process. We don't know what they are...the Government... Feds... State ...Municipal...tax...tipping...use...I mean...the devil's in the details. To claim your simple formula is the true measure of this business, given your self proclaimed business expertise...is really...the scam.
Quote:
If that happens, are you going to sell into a rise...or are you going to wait until the story fades away and then wait for the next carrot?
And now, in the face of this impending doom for the naked short position, you are out here getting a feeler out of the longs.....what they plan to do with their shares...if we get a bump. Seriously dude?
Quote:
Personally, I think you're waging a battle against the wrong people...and you're still praising the people who were actually responsible for you losing your money.
For the true longs...I feel for them. I wasn't in it back then... refused.... although I was aware. In reality, I can't be bothered by the naked short position... nothing I can do to control it... it's gonna do what it's going to do.. end of story. But to say naked short selling does not occur ...and there couldn't possibly be one in PTOI... is the scam.
To inquire as to the investing practices of longs/traders while also implying we're being scammed...been lied to...but ....there's a possible bump on the way... please dude... I've given you far too much credit...I bet you're a "short"-haired lap dog.
(6)
(0)