I feel like I must have missed some inside joke.
What's up with the "wow, gee-whiz" tone of this post (as well as a similar post at the other board which seems to be taboo to bring up by name on this board!), wondering if this Jason Aspin is the same Jason Aspin named as a board member, despite the fact that this has been spelled out by the company, Mr. Aspin, numerous message board posts - including the original shareholder update from the company on 10/18?
In other words, I am certain you know that it is, so I am curious as to whose benefit your rhetorical question posts, are made, as well as the related response posts from the board moderator.
Maybe I'm just being overly sensitive to this, but when combined with AlanC's one-note theme about "watching shorty burn" and the impending "short squeeze" - even though it seemed to me a few posters came down on board member 'C911' when has asked if anyone had actually seen the "short squeeze" phenomenon come to pass, sending a stock price soaring upon the slightest positive news, even if the company had been otherwise foundering - and the oft repeated theory that the millions of dollars in value of non-existent shares traded are the biggest asset of the company, just adds up to a really sketchy, fishy, mess.
I really have tried to understand the "longs" position, and reason for hope, but it just does not make sense to me.
Although I guess I kind-of agree on one point: for the life of me, I can not fathom why anyone (with the very remote exception of a) a gambling-type of day-trader, or b) an irrationally optimistic "long", would buy a single share of this stock!
JL, jr.
What's up with the "wow, gee-whiz" tone of this post (as well as a similar post at the other board which seems to be taboo to bring up by name on this board!), wondering if this Jason Aspin is the same Jason Aspin named as a board member, despite the fact that this has been spelled out by the company, Mr. Aspin, numerous message board posts - including the original shareholder update from the company on 10/18?
In other words, I am certain you know that it is, so I am curious as to whose benefit your rhetorical question posts, are made, as well as the related response posts from the board moderator.
Maybe I'm just being overly sensitive to this, but when combined with AlanC's one-note theme about "watching shorty burn" and the impending "short squeeze" - even though it seemed to me a few posters came down on board member 'C911' when has asked if anyone had actually seen the "short squeeze" phenomenon come to pass, sending a stock price soaring upon the slightest positive news, even if the company had been otherwise foundering - and the oft repeated theory that the millions of dollars in value of non-existent shares traded are the biggest asset of the company, just adds up to a really sketchy, fishy, mess.
I really have tried to understand the "longs" position, and reason for hope, but it just does not make sense to me.
Although I guess I kind-of agree on one point: for the life of me, I can not fathom why anyone (with the very remote exception of a) a gambling-type of day-trader, or b) an irrationally optimistic "long", would buy a single share of this stock!
JL, jr.
