PM in about link posted re: due dates ..
sorry about that .. hopefully this one works ..
http://www.finra.org/industry/short-interest/...-due-dates
key here is settlement date of 11.15.17 .. with T + 2 .. that means *trades* done
on 11.14.17 .. which is this coming Tuesday ..
watch to see how *volume* or daily reg sho %s are handled on IPIX .. both Monday and Tuesday ..
this is a quick primer since 9.5.17 (T+2) re: settlement dates specific to volume
.. tape of trades .. and what was marked on the day of and the day b4 settlement date (since T+2 implemented)
so for 9.15.17
9.29.17
10.13.17
10.31.17
note there is one day of *volume* and another day less so .. and while the 1.2M was *held* .. imo .. during this time .. you can clearly see .. what was
reported .. 5 out of 8 .. run above 30% .. 2 of which are above 40%
next up Monday and Tuesday's volume .. or lack of ..
tape of trades' link (you can click back to see any day's tape of trades)
again i've stressed at every turn .. that NR is upside down on IPIX
and that while the daily reg sho %s are worth noting .. it's what NR actually
reveals at every turn that is key to understanding what is being done
this isn't retail .. and it isn't retail that attempts to normalize non normal *trading* .. or denigrate this info ..
FTDs .. are done (reported by SRO/NRs) in arrears .. like
almost every thing else out of the imo corrupt and complicit SEC ..
what is ironic is one of the only RT (real time data points)
is the daily reg sho % .. but i digress
if you understand that IPIX's PPS was far higher 2 years ago .. and that NR
works cycles of money and did so literally unchecked for a decade + against
almost every OTC stock/company .. and that NR all collude .. and that NR
can *stall or hold* almost for perpetuity .. because almost always NR can outlast both retail and OTC mgmts
and of course >> flood SMBs << as needed
so 2 years ago .. IPIX's *legal* (and honestly imo what is reported is bogus
most likely a % of what has to be *reported* to not trigger reg sho) was held
@ approx 1.2M .. after all of NRs' combined/colluding efforts .. NR *reported*
another stall of 800k~ .. why does this matter .. well imo everything is % based
800000/1200000 = 66.66% .. based on years of observation imo anything
NR has to *mark* above 30% reveals NRs' stress ..
that is why when Mgmt surprised to the upside on 6.8.17 .. (change out)
we all saw daily reg sho %s blow up and out .. b4 NR could camouflage
(about a month) .. but they couldn't hold that 800k .. that had been more or
less held since Jan 2017 .. which is why 800k had to *adjust* to 1.2M
and contrary to some beliefs that IPIX's *legal* would decrease .. my expectation is it continues to increase
when *volume* is reduced .. in conjunction with relentless PPS compression
and *investors .. not talking traders here* .. can't be parted from their IPIX shares
NR has a dilemma literally of their own making ..
it is crystal clear *goal* is to reset the 52 week low .. i found it ironic NR had
to interrupt that effort to do their 3rd (what i refer to) mini controlled take up
.. this round to 85c (fitting my previously stated belief that they could not
take IPIX up much beyond that PPS range)
every time NR pushes IPIX lower .. without getting investors' shares .. you see it by
what the daily tape of trades reveals .. and imo by what gets marked .. again
day by day .. not so important .. but patterns' shown over weeks/months
and IPIX's case >> years .. is beyond revealing
the stock (like almost every other OTC stock) was manipulated from the get go
interestingly .. those companies who came public via a R/M seem to have
extra *elasticity* re: what NR *reports* .. vs those OTC companies who came
public via an S1 registration ..
anyhow .. i hope this helps a few more understand what is being done
as always folks have to do what is best for themselves and their money
best to all Innovation investors .. will post out weekly tape of trades tomorrow
4kids
sorry about that .. hopefully this one works ..
http://www.finra.org/industry/short-interest/...-due-dates
key here is settlement date of 11.15.17 .. with T + 2 .. that means *trades* done
on 11.14.17 .. which is this coming Tuesday ..
Wednesday November 15
Friday November 17 – 6 p.m.
Monday November 27
watch to see how *volume* or daily reg sho %s are handled on IPIX .. both Monday and Tuesday ..
this is a quick primer since 9.5.17 (T+2) re: settlement dates specific to volume
.. tape of trades .. and what was marked on the day of and the day b4 settlement date (since T+2 implemented)
so for 9.15.17
Sep 14 2017 0.75749 0.7105 0.70999 0.75749 135,818
Sep 15 2017 0.70999 0.72 0.68 0.73 223,443
Sep 14 NA NA NA 135,818 59,017 43.45%
Sep 15 NA NA NA 223,443 50,005 22.38%
9.29.17
Sep 27 2017 0.735 0.725 0.72 0.74 195,084
Sep 28 2017 0.735 0.71249 0.70999 0.735 93,123
Sep 27 NA NA NA 195,084 49,544 25.40%
Sep 28 NA NA NA 93,123 20,433 21.94%
10.13.17
Oct 11 2017 0.69999 0.70499 0.665 0.70999 203,173
Oct 12 2017 0.708 0.6901 0.67 0.708 109,698
Oct 11 NA NA NA 203,173 61,637 30.34%
Oct 12 NA NA NA 108,198 34,339 31.74%
10.31.17
Oct 27 2017 0.76999 0.83999 0.75849 0.85 435,885
Oct 30 2017 0.82999 0.79 0.76999 0.83499 189,350
Oct 27 NA NA NA 435,785 200,224 45.95%
Oct 30 NA NA NA 189,350 57,114 30.16%
note there is one day of *volume* and another day less so .. and while the 1.2M was *held* .. imo .. during this time .. you can clearly see .. what was
reported .. 5 out of 8 .. run above 30% .. 2 of which are above 40%
next up Monday and Tuesday's volume .. or lack of ..
tape of trades' link (you can click back to see any day's tape of trades)
again i've stressed at every turn .. that NR is upside down on IPIX
and that while the daily reg sho %s are worth noting .. it's what NR actually
reveals at every turn that is key to understanding what is being done
this isn't retail .. and it isn't retail that attempts to normalize non normal *trading* .. or denigrate this info ..
FTDs .. are done (reported by SRO/NRs) in arrears .. like
almost every thing else out of the imo corrupt and complicit SEC ..
what is ironic is one of the only RT (real time data points)
is the daily reg sho % .. but i digress
if you understand that IPIX's PPS was far higher 2 years ago .. and that NR
works cycles of money and did so literally unchecked for a decade + against
almost every OTC stock/company .. and that NR all collude .. and that NR
can *stall or hold* almost for perpetuity .. because almost always NR can outlast both retail and OTC mgmts
and of course >> flood SMBs << as needed
so 2 years ago .. IPIX's *legal* (and honestly imo what is reported is bogus
most likely a % of what has to be *reported* to not trigger reg sho) was held
@ approx 1.2M .. after all of NRs' combined/colluding efforts .. NR *reported*
another stall of 800k~ .. why does this matter .. well imo everything is % based
800000/1200000 = 66.66% .. based on years of observation imo anything
NR has to *mark* above 30% reveals NRs' stress ..
that is why when Mgmt surprised to the upside on 6.8.17 .. (change out)
we all saw daily reg sho %s blow up and out .. b4 NR could camouflage
(about a month) .. but they couldn't hold that 800k .. that had been more or
less held since Jan 2017 .. which is why 800k had to *adjust* to 1.2M
and contrary to some beliefs that IPIX's *legal* would decrease .. my expectation is it continues to increase
when *volume* is reduced .. in conjunction with relentless PPS compression
and *investors .. not talking traders here* .. can't be parted from their IPIX shares
NR has a dilemma literally of their own making ..
it is crystal clear *goal* is to reset the 52 week low .. i found it ironic NR had
to interrupt that effort to do their 3rd (what i refer to) mini controlled take up
.. this round to 85c (fitting my previously stated belief that they could not
take IPIX up much beyond that PPS range)
every time NR pushes IPIX lower .. without getting investors' shares .. you see it by
what the daily tape of trades reveals .. and imo by what gets marked .. again
day by day .. not so important .. but patterns' shown over weeks/months
and IPIX's case >> years .. is beyond revealing
the stock (like almost every other OTC stock) was manipulated from the get go
interestingly .. those companies who came public via a R/M seem to have
extra *elasticity* re: what NR *reports* .. vs those OTC companies who came
public via an S1 registration ..
anyhow .. i hope this helps a few more understand what is being done
as always folks have to do what is best for themselves and their money
best to all Innovation investors .. will post out weekly tape of trades tomorrow
4kids
3
