Sue me...? Good luck. Company wouldnt want the cou
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 490)
Posted On: 10/28/2017 5:22:37 PM
Sue me...? Good luck. Company wouldnt want the counter suit let alone the legal exposure.
Despite your and others' insidious claims on here - I have never shorted this stock or have been compensated in any manner to give opinions good or bad.
I DEFINITELY have a financial incentive to have other shareholders speak out and pressure the company for real transparency and if it isnt provided - then join together in a lawsuit. I have never sold any shares in this stock which was primarily due to the claims and statements made by the company and its affiliates which generally turned out to be false or completely contradicted. Bill should have immediately corrected Jame's statements and answers on the CC surrounding the guaranteed BTL revenues and OS expectations and he didnt. Later he said they were a completely separate entity and he was responsible for what they said or tweeted. That was BS. They were listed as the IR contact on the PRs and Bill not only called them the new Investor Relations group, he said the Twitter feed was the source for company information.
My post history in its entirety speaks for itself ajd would be the ultimate evidence in any suit the company would try to bring about. Further, my emails back and forth to IR and Bill would further show a consistent trend of being a staunch shareholder to disenfranchised by the BS coming from IR and the lacknof transparency by Bill/company. He knows its true. He begrudgingly admitted I proved my holdings. It wasnt because I was trying to leverage him - I clearly stated it was to refute James claiming to him I was not a shareholder and part of the iLie crowd. I immediately sent a screenshot that couldnt be fabricated (not instantaneously anyway). I still have those shares though they are essentially worthless since the company has been severely diluted, still has no meaningful revenues, and there is no transparency going forward. Bill/IR had the opportunity to buy me out a long time ago if they wanted this issue to go away.
So keep trying to twist, distort, slander, etc. Wont work.
If there is no fiduciary oversight to be had for shareholders- I will seek it from the SEC and then the courts if need be. If others feel the same, they are welcome to contact me. I am not here to save others. I am here to make (recover) money and to hold those accountable that purposely manipulated/mislead investors with numbers/guidance/PRs that they had no intentjon or ability to back up.
There will be zero evidence of me ever calling Timken, BTL, etc with respect to TPAC or working with or on behalf of any MM, website, shorting outfit because it never, EVER happened. There is plenty evidence from the IR Twitter feed, PRs, company website, CC with James, and posts on here from Bill and others (agents of the company/IR/SI) that show what appears to be a calculated attempt to manipulate the PPS and shareholders (inflated revenue claims, contracts, agreements, EIAs, MRVBs, superfluous PPS expectations or predictions, definitive statements any stock buybacks, trying to suppress shareholders looking for answers on these, etc). So good luck with that lawsuit.
Before you file the suit - better take a real hard look at the CC James conducted and Bill's posts on here/Twitter about the BTL contract/SLA.
Despite your and others' insidious claims on here - I have never shorted this stock or have been compensated in any manner to give opinions good or bad.
I DEFINITELY have a financial incentive to have other shareholders speak out and pressure the company for real transparency and if it isnt provided - then join together in a lawsuit. I have never sold any shares in this stock which was primarily due to the claims and statements made by the company and its affiliates which generally turned out to be false or completely contradicted. Bill should have immediately corrected Jame's statements and answers on the CC surrounding the guaranteed BTL revenues and OS expectations and he didnt. Later he said they were a completely separate entity and he was responsible for what they said or tweeted. That was BS. They were listed as the IR contact on the PRs and Bill not only called them the new Investor Relations group, he said the Twitter feed was the source for company information.
My post history in its entirety speaks for itself ajd would be the ultimate evidence in any suit the company would try to bring about. Further, my emails back and forth to IR and Bill would further show a consistent trend of being a staunch shareholder to disenfranchised by the BS coming from IR and the lacknof transparency by Bill/company. He knows its true. He begrudgingly admitted I proved my holdings. It wasnt because I was trying to leverage him - I clearly stated it was to refute James claiming to him I was not a shareholder and part of the iLie crowd. I immediately sent a screenshot that couldnt be fabricated (not instantaneously anyway). I still have those shares though they are essentially worthless since the company has been severely diluted, still has no meaningful revenues, and there is no transparency going forward. Bill/IR had the opportunity to buy me out a long time ago if they wanted this issue to go away.
So keep trying to twist, distort, slander, etc. Wont work.
If there is no fiduciary oversight to be had for shareholders- I will seek it from the SEC and then the courts if need be. If others feel the same, they are welcome to contact me. I am not here to save others. I am here to make (recover) money and to hold those accountable that purposely manipulated/mislead investors with numbers/guidance/PRs that they had no intentjon or ability to back up.
There will be zero evidence of me ever calling Timken, BTL, etc with respect to TPAC or working with or on behalf of any MM, website, shorting outfit because it never, EVER happened. There is plenty evidence from the IR Twitter feed, PRs, company website, CC with James, and posts on here from Bill and others (agents of the company/IR/SI) that show what appears to be a calculated attempt to manipulate the PPS and shareholders (inflated revenue claims, contracts, agreements, EIAs, MRVBs, superfluous PPS expectations or predictions, definitive statements any stock buybacks, trying to suppress shareholders looking for answers on these, etc). So good luck with that lawsuit.
Before you file the suit - better take a real hard look at the CC James conducted and Bill's posts on here/Twitter about the BTL contract/SLA.
(0)
(1)