Perhaps, but I forget who it was on the other boar

Perhaps, but I forget who it was on the other board that was making a distinction that code had to be sent to your phone (second channel) and then the code had to also be input on your phone (also in the second channel) to be considered ooba that sti owns patent for and if code from phone was entered on your browser where you were already logging in (first channel) then it was not truly ooba or at least not the ooba that sti owns patent