I think the frustration comes from being told that

I think the frustration comes from being told that they would do a better job communicating with the shareholders by monthly newsletters. I believe the last newsletter was May 17th? There are many things they can say that are not restricted to keep shareholders informed and part of the process. They for example can provide status of certain things even if it was delayed by just saying so. There are many topics that are not dependent on the other that could be addressed. Instead they have deferred this process to Investor Relations representative which has not made many shareholders happy with the incomplete or partial responses they get back if a response is received at all. So yes frustration when the investor sees their investment represented by PPS continue to fall without receiving any meaningful information for months on end leading to speculation and negative conclusions. For example Dr. Gulas resignation was not provided to shareholders but in letter responding to court deposition. So who is in charge now? Even if in an acting capacity until announcement can be made of a new CEO? I say this in response to frustration but I also know that soon the info we desire will be made available and this will all come to pass hopefully with renewed excitement for the future of NTEK.