right mgmt could seemingly pursue lots of options
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 264)
Posted On: 09/12/2017 11:25:50 PM
Re: Commando911 #36983
right mgmt could seemingly pursue lots of options .. we have also discussed those as well
and not being flip here .. but only RH can answer that .. in March 2016
he seemingly *imo* acknowledged the need for an internal sales effort
and a year and a half later .. *nada*
and realistically what could that be? .. specifics re: the sinister .. if the goal is
to get the stock down to no bid .. so X entity can buy up the float .. for fractions
on the dollar .. it requires actual folks to sell and others not to buy .. so far
based on what gets passed on .. there are still buyers of PTOI .. even tho'
everyone recognizes the always decreasing PPS ..
again not being flip but RH doesn't strike me as the type to go for *smears* on his reputation (perceived or otherwise) which is why *personality wise* and
money invested wise .. i've always ruled out BK as an option .. clearly i could be wrong .. but i've been reading the BK route by the *crew* working IHUB since 2013
.. it's equally clear that RC has had success re: implementation of this
technology and that avenue is being pursued *version 2* .. by RH .. whether
it conveys .. i'm not sure if known by anyone except those directly involved .. and as we've noted b4 .. there are no leaks with RH .. this is a man who didn't
even *promote* NYSDEC permits issued in the summer of 2014 ..
well the issue there is there are currently only 2 BoD *members* .. RH and PB
it would be nice to see a slate of candidates re: BoD actually be seated ..
along with CEO's form/s updated and a date for an AGM .. also noted in 2016
personally i look forward to that actually coming to pass .. because imo
(depending on who would actually be seated) .. various POV being presented
to current mgmt
i grew up with the expression many hands make light work .. having sold a
disruptive tech (2 decades b4 it would become the norm) .. i recognize the value of out of the box thinking
this mgmt has always had options .. some of which RH has noted (2016)
why it has taken the time to implement them .. only RH knows .. as you and
everyone else i interact with knows .. my refrain is always .. rumors are just rumors
until they are filed .. i suspect there will be some very frustrated investors *if*
RH doesn't execute on some level b4 the EOY 2017 .. including myself ..
that said whether that actually translates to volume isn't a given as has been
noted since 2013 YOY always decreasing (and in 2017's case rather significantly) volume
it will be interesting to see if volume actually kicks up the closer to EOY it gets
we shall see ..
4kids
Quote:
What does elude me is why hasn't Heddle invested money to hire someone to move this forward?
and not being flip here .. but only RH can answer that .. in March 2016
he seemingly *imo* acknowledged the need for an internal sales effort
and a year and a half later .. *nada*
Quote:
To me, that's the creepiest part of all this. Which leads me to think there is something more sinister going on.
and realistically what could that be? .. specifics re: the sinister .. if the goal is
to get the stock down to no bid .. so X entity can buy up the float .. for fractions
on the dollar .. it requires actual folks to sell and others not to buy .. so far
based on what gets passed on .. there are still buyers of PTOI .. even tho'
everyone recognizes the always decreasing PPS ..
again not being flip but RH doesn't strike me as the type to go for *smears* on his reputation (perceived or otherwise) which is why *personality wise* and
money invested wise .. i've always ruled out BK as an option .. clearly i could be wrong .. but i've been reading the BK route by the *crew* working IHUB since 2013
.. it's equally clear that RC has had success re: implementation of this
technology and that avenue is being pursued *version 2* .. by RH .. whether
it conveys .. i'm not sure if known by anyone except those directly involved .. and as we've noted b4 .. there are no leaks with RH .. this is a man who didn't
even *promote* NYSDEC permits issued in the summer of 2014 ..
Quote:
BTW, I've been told,that all of,the former potential bod candidates....are out because of management. Could be a nasty rumor. But my source is pretty good.
well the issue there is there are currently only 2 BoD *members* .. RH and PB
it would be nice to see a slate of candidates re: BoD actually be seated ..
along with CEO's form/s updated and a date for an AGM .. also noted in 2016
personally i look forward to that actually coming to pass .. because imo
(depending on who would actually be seated) .. various POV being presented
to current mgmt
i grew up with the expression many hands make light work .. having sold a
disruptive tech (2 decades b4 it would become the norm) .. i recognize the value of out of the box thinking
this mgmt has always had options .. some of which RH has noted (2016)
why it has taken the time to implement them .. only RH knows .. as you and
everyone else i interact with knows .. my refrain is always .. rumors are just rumors
until they are filed .. i suspect there will be some very frustrated investors *if*
RH doesn't execute on some level b4 the EOY 2017 .. including myself ..
that said whether that actually translates to volume isn't a given as has been
noted since 2013 YOY always decreasing (and in 2017's case rather significantly) volume
it will be interesting to see if volume actually kicks up the closer to EOY it gets
we shall see ..
4kids
(1)
(0)