I did answer his question. You just seem to be con

I did answer his question. You just seem to be confused because I answered him and didn't blame anything on volume, mirrored crap, CE's, boogeymen, compressed pps, resets and whatever else you point fingers at except the company and CEO.

Quote:

---

but you didn't answer GG's very specific ?

now it may be you actually missed the *weeks* of efforts and the 50000 to 60000
*bot* posts directed specifically via this SMB .. starting back just about 2 years ago


some might remember they started just after the 12500 trades got underway

btw the *rude* being noted by GG .. is in relation to the *content* of the bot posts ..
it is a four letter word that starts with C and ends with T ..

today the random bot posts by bot aliases may upon occasion slip thru .. but as
i've noted *here* .. rather recently .. admin has addressed this attack en masse
so odds are entity/entities behind *efforts* get even less *attention* ot traction for their one hit wonders

on an aside .. it is odd to some actual P2O investors that the efforts done
2 years ago when PTOI's PPS was .05~ and per all those negative posts
there .. everyone had *sold* out of PTOI .. that the effort would have been *expended* at all ..

then again some recognize that volume increases .. it doesn't decrease as a
PPS is compressed .. NRs' efforts always *conflate* dollar value vs share per share

something i first noted on the vehicle of choice back when the author of P2O's
first hit piece posted daily that no OTC stocks were ever shorted .. and that reference is to legal shorting not the abusive kind

what is even more telling for some of us is why the utilization of bots would be undertaken at all against some .. of course the fact that *money* is involved may have something to do with it

4kids

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=473...z4sVNow6fA

---