That is illogical. Byrd was a Democrat and his rep
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 673)
Posted On: 08/16/2017 9:16:28 PM
That is illogical. Byrd was a Democrat and his repudiations and apologies were accepted on both sides of the aisle. So the Dems were on the record and could say nothing if Trump had puckered up.
Unless you want to do some time travel shit.
The larger point is that Trump is the only one engaging in moral relativism RE the Nazis and he is being repudiated daily by more and more Republicans.....and businessman.
I don't defend denying speakers the right to speak or the property destruction, but neither do I accept your implied moral equivalence of those people with those chanting "the Jews will not replace us" and
that old Nazi favorite "blood and soil".
I'm waiting for Jerrod to grow a pair RE that first chant.
The right wins the Kristallnacht Award with the chants and with the white supremacist terrorist behind the wheel. One dead, many more injured. Still want to try and compare?
Let's assume for a second that it was Trump and not the Hildebeest that was puckering up to Byrd in that picture. It wouldn't matter what he had repudiated and apologized for. Even if his heart was now so pure that even God himself would have stepped out of heaven and declared Byrd's heart to be pure, that wouldn't have been no where near enough for the Librul nut burgers out there!!!... And after that picture got out, the librul shit hemorrhage that followed would have been heard/smelled all around the world for weeks to come.
I'll defer to your chronicle of how the battles progressed since they occurred mostly on your turf. The end result was foreordained by the industrial might and population of the North and by the inability of the South to secure foreign support.
And the South has paid for the loss for over 160 years economically, educationally and through decreased life expectancies from poor health. See the 'diabetes belt'.
Satchel Paige knew of what he spoke:
https://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2011/...t-outlined
Unless you want to do some time travel shit.
The larger point is that Trump is the only one engaging in moral relativism RE the Nazis and he is being repudiated daily by more and more Republicans.....and businessman.
I don't defend denying speakers the right to speak or the property destruction, but neither do I accept your implied moral equivalence of those people with those chanting "the Jews will not replace us" and
that old Nazi favorite "blood and soil".
I'm waiting for Jerrod to grow a pair RE that first chant.
The right wins the Kristallnacht Award with the chants and with the white supremacist terrorist behind the wheel. One dead, many more injured. Still want to try and compare?
Let's assume for a second that it was Trump and not the Hildebeest that was puckering up to Byrd in that picture. It wouldn't matter what he had repudiated and apologized for. Even if his heart was now so pure that even God himself would have stepped out of heaven and declared Byrd's heart to be pure, that wouldn't have been no where near enough for the Librul nut burgers out there!!!... And after that picture got out, the librul shit hemorrhage that followed would have been heard/smelled all around the world for weeks to come.
I'll defer to your chronicle of how the battles progressed since they occurred mostly on your turf. The end result was foreordained by the industrial might and population of the North and by the inability of the South to secure foreign support.
And the South has paid for the loss for over 160 years economically, educationally and through decreased life expectancies from poor health. See the 'diabetes belt'.
Satchel Paige knew of what he spoke:
https://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2011/...t-outlined
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼