Those of you inclined to roll your eyes back into your head and skip reading this post because "ol' F1ash is at it again" need to resist the urge to ignore this post and read to the end. I'm gonna tell you something very important. (At the end). You can skip ahead to the end if necessary.
Ok Alan, I really do hope your doing better and your health is improving.
I don't feel like I am "attacking" you. I gave your theory enough credence to ask management to try the cusip thingy. Why would I do that if I dismissed you offhand?
I have subsequently asked you to at least start including a link to your source when you post the "short volume" percentage. If you haven't noticed I almost alway include links to information I post. Have you noticed that?
You answer so far is basically "No I don't wanna" .
I'm unfortunately left with two reasons I can come up with to explain why you won't include the link.
1. Your shorting (secretly) and want the "daily short" you post to scare people.
I have been assured by people I trust that you are actually long this stock so that leaves me with
Number 2
You want to create the impression that the information is "exclusive" and we need you to provide it. You are indeed important to us and have valuable contributions to make to the board. You can do better than just "the naked shorts are gonna get us all" though in my opinion.
Trying to make it look like that information is "exclusive" to you is akin to plagiarizing imho. It's government data so it's not exactly plagiarism but man it's a close cousin imho.
So that you know ahead of time, if I do convince you to start including the link I'm gonna start in next trying to make you include 5 to 10 other companies percentages each day to make it obvious that the number is unintelligible. Just a heads up of what to expect.
Here comes (the end).
Trials have been 100% successful up until this point and the only possible explanation is the "naked shorts and corrupt MM's" are causing the share price weakness.
Take out a piece of paper and write down your answer to the following question.
Are there unanswered questions in the results from all of the trials so far that could explain the share price weakness because "some uncertainty" still remains?
Well is there?
Yes, there is imho.
I'm about to give you an example. I'm invested here and hope IPIX succeeds so I'm only gonna give you one single example. Since I have an example (I believe) for every single trial for every single indication I'm only going to give you the one that will (I hope) create the least possibility to be used as a tool by shorts. (Make sense?)
Is B-ABSSI a "lock" to succeed?
No, it's not imho and potential partners probably know that. That's why they haven't ponied up a good enough offer just yet. That's also why IPIX is unwilling to "bet the farm" on B-ABSSI. It's not a "lock".
Why do I say that?
Well, because there are still unanswered questions about Brilacidin's effects on Ion channels that are associated with systemic exposure. This could potentially cause cardiac issue limitations.
Horse shit you say?
http://allphasepharma.com/dir/2015/07/10/1693...-juncture/
I have similar DD for every trial thus far imho. (Except Kevetrin which is too complicated for me to tackle). That's not false bravado by the way imho it is just my opinion on the relevance of the DD.
I'm not saying I'm hiding "bad news". I'm just saying there are "unanswered questions" for ever single trial that is probably still affecting the share price and it's not the "naked short bogeyman".
I'm still invested here, even been buying recently so I'm still confident in success and "believe" in management.
This is all just my own opinion about my own DD though so I could be wrong.
I'm not a doctor. Never had a class in microbiology. Not really that smart compared to some of you probably.
I don't see the daily short number as "helpful" I see it as "hurtful" I would ignore it, but it misleads new investors and that's not "right" imho.
Please stop doing it. Please.
On another note, several times daily I have to grit my teeth as I see someone here accusing someone of being someone else or posting veiled threats of personal violence. I hate that and should be deleting it honestly. Please stop.
By the way, if someone accuses me of being someone else I will intentionally reply to posts in "the wrong Id" just to jack with you because I can be a real smart ass myself. It's an occasional hazard.
Have a great day everyone and I'm really hoping for positive Prurisol results.
F1ash
Ok Alan, I really do hope your doing better and your health is improving.
I don't feel like I am "attacking" you. I gave your theory enough credence to ask management to try the cusip thingy. Why would I do that if I dismissed you offhand?
I have subsequently asked you to at least start including a link to your source when you post the "short volume" percentage. If you haven't noticed I almost alway include links to information I post. Have you noticed that?
You answer so far is basically "No I don't wanna" .
I'm unfortunately left with two reasons I can come up with to explain why you won't include the link.
1. Your shorting (secretly) and want the "daily short" you post to scare people.
I have been assured by people I trust that you are actually long this stock so that leaves me with
Number 2
You want to create the impression that the information is "exclusive" and we need you to provide it. You are indeed important to us and have valuable contributions to make to the board. You can do better than just "the naked shorts are gonna get us all" though in my opinion.
Trying to make it look like that information is "exclusive" to you is akin to plagiarizing imho. It's government data so it's not exactly plagiarism but man it's a close cousin imho.
So that you know ahead of time, if I do convince you to start including the link I'm gonna start in next trying to make you include 5 to 10 other companies percentages each day to make it obvious that the number is unintelligible. Just a heads up of what to expect.
Here comes (the end).
Trials have been 100% successful up until this point and the only possible explanation is the "naked shorts and corrupt MM's" are causing the share price weakness.
Take out a piece of paper and write down your answer to the following question.
Are there unanswered questions in the results from all of the trials so far that could explain the share price weakness because "some uncertainty" still remains?
Well is there?
Yes, there is imho.
I'm about to give you an example. I'm invested here and hope IPIX succeeds so I'm only gonna give you one single example. Since I have an example (I believe) for every single trial for every single indication I'm only going to give you the one that will (I hope) create the least possibility to be used as a tool by shorts. (Make sense?)
Is B-ABSSI a "lock" to succeed?
No, it's not imho and potential partners probably know that. That's why they haven't ponied up a good enough offer just yet. That's also why IPIX is unwilling to "bet the farm" on B-ABSSI. It's not a "lock".
Why do I say that?
Well, because there are still unanswered questions about Brilacidin's effects on Ion channels that are associated with systemic exposure. This could potentially cause cardiac issue limitations.
Horse shit you say?
http://allphasepharma.com/dir/2015/07/10/1693...-juncture/
I have similar DD for every trial thus far imho. (Except Kevetrin which is too complicated for me to tackle). That's not false bravado by the way imho it is just my opinion on the relevance of the DD.
I'm not saying I'm hiding "bad news". I'm just saying there are "unanswered questions" for ever single trial that is probably still affecting the share price and it's not the "naked short bogeyman".
I'm still invested here, even been buying recently so I'm still confident in success and "believe" in management.
This is all just my own opinion about my own DD though so I could be wrong.
I'm not a doctor. Never had a class in microbiology. Not really that smart compared to some of you probably.
I don't see the daily short number as "helpful" I see it as "hurtful" I would ignore it, but it misleads new investors and that's not "right" imho.
Please stop doing it. Please.
On another note, several times daily I have to grit my teeth as I see someone here accusing someone of being someone else or posting veiled threats of personal violence. I hate that and should be deleting it honestly. Please stop.
By the way, if someone accuses me of being someone else I will intentionally reply to posts in "the wrong Id" just to jack with you because I can be a real smart ass myself. It's an occasional hazard.
Have a great day everyone and I'm really hoping for positive Prurisol results.
F1ash
8
