i was posting to alan .. and expect that those who
Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 421)
Posted On: 07/03/2017 9:07:16 AM
i was posting to alan .. and expect that those who don't want to read my posts
will have me on ignore as i have no doubts some do .. that said i get a lot of PMs
in from others here who might not be familiar with how *trolls* are seeded into
various SMBs *at every turn/round* .. which is why it's always so interesting to
see who *imo* outs themselves the more NRs' (non retails) *stress* is revealed
but mostly what i've always argued is that the OTC is poorly watched and almost
always manipulated .. making it far more difficult for legit companies to *outlast*
NRs' efforts .. which is why when Finra went live with this link .. i spent the month
of Feb 2010 on the phone with various employees of both the SEC and Finra
it's also why i've ALWAYS noted that it's not the one day daily reg sho %s that
matter .. it's what is shown over weeks/months and in some OTC *targeted*
survivors .. *years* .. understanding an increasing % above 30% isn't intricate
or difficult for most retail investors .. it's why what i've always posted is always
*twisted* .. when one can show (as i did in the post to alan yesterday on a very
slow day here on this SMB) .. it's crystal clear what is being done for those
willing to view aspects from another POV ..
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4638682
i noted in this very venue .. numerous times .. that *stress* was in play and that
NR is struggling .. it's also why *imo* that the legal has had to *actually* adjust
upwards .. since that less than wise decision and last round
what is really telling to me is why this interpretation *threatens* .. because with
the targeted company's ability to execute .. and imo Innovation has the perfect
*set up* to force NRs' hands .. by first partnering .. then issuing a one time special
cash div .. and then almost immediately uplisting .. which keeps the *stress*
in play due to lack of liquidity .. which is artificially generated by those who do
illegally manipulate stox regardless of where *traded*
the ones i find morally repugnant are those who collude to fleece retail at every turn
what i've also always noted is there are cycles of money played out against every OTC
company and mgmt and then in turn their retail investors until *imo* NR is
upside down to such a degree the only *round* that can NR can execute
is the shake to part actual retail (vs trolls) investors out of their shares (imo
every thing done is % based) or *kill* the targeted company outright
unlike the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation .. this site has unlimited
ignores .. i suggest everyone who has an issue with educating themselves
on this topic .. put me on ignore .. my feelings won't be hurt ..
lastly i've never considered the handful of posts done weekly on this topic
to be *noise* .. rather another way to view aspects *many* retail have been
conditioned against .. by those who do collude
that said .. those who do consider it noise .. should utilize features provided by this site
if you celebrate .. a safe and happy 4th
4kids
will have me on ignore as i have no doubts some do .. that said i get a lot of PMs
in from others here who might not be familiar with how *trolls* are seeded into
various SMBs *at every turn/round* .. which is why it's always so interesting to
see who *imo* outs themselves the more NRs' (non retails) *stress* is revealed
but mostly what i've always argued is that the OTC is poorly watched and almost
always manipulated .. making it far more difficult for legit companies to *outlast*
NRs' efforts .. which is why when Finra went live with this link .. i spent the month
of Feb 2010 on the phone with various employees of both the SEC and Finra
it's also why i've ALWAYS noted that it's not the one day daily reg sho %s that
matter .. it's what is shown over weeks/months and in some OTC *targeted*
survivors .. *years* .. understanding an increasing % above 30% isn't intricate
or difficult for most retail investors .. it's why what i've always posted is always
*twisted* .. when one can show (as i did in the post to alan yesterday on a very
slow day here on this SMB) .. it's crystal clear what is being done for those
willing to view aspects from another POV ..
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4638682
i noted in this very venue .. numerous times .. that *stress* was in play and that
NR is struggling .. it's also why *imo* that the legal has had to *actually* adjust
upwards .. since that less than wise decision and last round
what is really telling to me is why this interpretation *threatens* .. because with
the targeted company's ability to execute .. and imo Innovation has the perfect
*set up* to force NRs' hands .. by first partnering .. then issuing a one time special
cash div .. and then almost immediately uplisting .. which keeps the *stress*
in play due to lack of liquidity .. which is artificially generated by those who do
illegally manipulate stox regardless of where *traded*
the ones i find morally repugnant are those who collude to fleece retail at every turn
what i've also always noted is there are cycles of money played out against every OTC
company and mgmt and then in turn their retail investors until *imo* NR is
upside down to such a degree the only *round* that can NR can execute
is the shake to part actual retail (vs trolls) investors out of their shares (imo
every thing done is % based) or *kill* the targeted company outright
unlike the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation .. this site has unlimited
ignores .. i suggest everyone who has an issue with educating themselves
on this topic .. put me on ignore .. my feelings won't be hurt ..
lastly i've never considered the handful of posts done weekly on this topic
to be *noise* .. rather another way to view aspects *many* retail have been
conditioned against .. by those who do collude
that said .. those who do consider it noise .. should utilize features provided by this site
if you celebrate .. a safe and happy 4th
4kids
Quote:
Here's what it comes down to, for me anyway.
You both seem to be describing your concerns about a system that applies to every company listed on the same exchange as IPIX. Right?
It's safe to say everyone here has heard your concerns and protestations. Why continually harp on the matter on this board? It actually harms current shareholders more than it helps. Most investors have no clue of the intricacies you are trying to illustrate. New investors see "60% shares shorted today" and run for the freaking hills. Ever considered posting that stuff on all the other boards and not on this one. You would reach a wider audience and maybe scare some investors this way instead of running them off.
I'm not bashing you guys, hell I personally suggested Cellceutix do the name/cusip change just in case because Cellceutix was a crappy name. Cellceutix has fought lawsuits rather then just settle, they have done the name/cusip thing just in case let's give them a break please.
What you two seem insistent on doing is hurting IPIX not helping, would you mind enlightening different investors for a while on other boards. It's a big market just loaded with other stocks who could use the information you are providing.
(4)
(1)