alan ..
this is *classic* .. (comments from *there*) by a mutually coordinated thumbs' downer for both of us *here* ..
btw this to me is classic troll conditioning .. reason being is that the *assumption*
er .. given .. is that the SEC actually gives a damn about the *transparency* on
any OTC stock that still exists ( survives ) due to originally coming public via a R/M into a previously used *shell* for a company that already was exterminated
note the OTC stox that have come public via S1 Registrations .. do *trigger* FTDs
as a reminder for those observing this ping pong match .. this is what the SEC
notes re: FTDs (failures to deliver re: what is termed hard locates .. in other words *shares*)
Pursuant to Rule 203(b)(3) of Regulation SHO and FINRA Rule 4320, a participant of a registered clearing agency (i.e., a clearing firm), that has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency (i.e., National Securities Clearing Corporation) in a Threshold Security for 13 consecutive settlement days must immediately close out that fail to deliver position by purchasing shares of like kind and quantity . (Please click the below Information icon for more details about the Threshold Security).
http://otce.finra.org/RegSHO
and of course this ..
REG SHO Overview
As defined in Rule 203(c)(6) of Regulation SHO, a “threshold security” is any equity security of any issuer that is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act (commonly referred to as reporting securities), where, for five consecutive settlement days:
There are aggregate fails to deliver at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more per security;
The level of fails is equal to at least one-half of one percent of the issuer’s total shares outstanding; and
The security is included on a list published by a self-regulatory organization (SRO).
A security ceases to be a threshold security if it does not exceed the specified level of fails for five consecutive settlement days .
rule 203 pertains to any company that is fully compliant .. ie they file (which of
course is Innovation Pharma)
4320 pertains to those OTC companies that *selectively* file .. in other words
not IPIX (or CTIX) which is/are OTCQB .. and if one wants to think of it this way
the more transparent .. the more *stress* is revealed which is why hedge funds
and their minions don't want this data *understood* .. because it isn't rocket science
but in the aggregate NR (non retail) can only roll an IOU so long with mgmt's
ability to execute .. (outlast them) .. reminder NR is used to controlling outcomes
when it comes to OTC stox .. (usually poorly watched with less than aware
mgmt teams)
i've shown since 5.10.17's incredibly stupid 52 week low *reset* .. by NR
just how revealing NRs' *stress* is since then .. or as i call it their *struggle*
( edit .. to save another post ... it's also why NR has had to morph up the *legal*
short since the EO April 2017 on IPIX/CTIX from approx 800,000 to 1.2M~)
and because the vehicle of choice doesn't allow for back and forth to *show*
what is done on other OTC stox .. this ? can't be asked back to mr. thumbs down
how is it a fully compliant OTCQB stock that came public via an S1 Registration
in April 2015 .. has triggered 7 rounds (mark my words since i do know this stuff
8th is en route *shortly* pun intended) .. since the EO April 2015 .. (4 in 2015
and 3 *so far* in 2017)
the board there .. like all
of that site's *boards* is littered with trolls .. pushing in this case .. the negative
because of course actual *shares* are needed and how is it of those 7 rounds
of FTDs (last one ended last month) .. that 13 days came and went ..
sans *buy ins* as is supposed to be *done* as noted by the SEC .. .. for at
least 3 of those 7 rounds .. which had 17 .. 19 and 23 days of FTDs
yeah .. the SEC isn't worth the paper their *mandate* is written on .. because
they are a paper tiger
as for the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation .. it's a beyond *clever*
TOU utilized to suit which ever *side* .. .. of NRs' cycles of money .. is needed
NR works cycles of money both UP and DOWN
btw .. here's why we both can see *stress* in play since 5.10.2017 on IPIX ..
reminder .. of what *avgs* showed then .. cause volume also matters in conjunction with what the daily tape of trades' reveals
====
Detailed Quote:CTIX
CELLCEUTIX CORPORATION
0.66Down -0.005 (-0.75 %)AS OF 3:57:19PM ET 05/10/2017
Last Trade 0.66
Trade Time 3:57:19pm ET
Change -0.005
% Change -0.75%
Open 0.656
Day High 0.67
Day Low 0.63 ** 52 week low reset again
Previous Close
05/09/2017 0.665
52-Week High
05/24/2016 1.73
52-Week Low
05/10/2017 0.63
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
05/09/2017 -59.20%
Volume 354,688 * vol done in a tightly held 4c *pps range* ..
Volume (10 day Average) 139,522 ** note prior 10 days' *efforts* on less vol
Volume (90 day Average) 278,652
ok and here's what *stress* looks like from NRs' POV .. count the days over 30%
(reminder this site does not include t trades .. which bypass daily reg sho %s)
since ticker/cusip change out (good job Leo) .. 13 out of 15 trading days ..
that is 86.66%
Historical Short Volume Data for IPIX
and b4 that .. just from the *last reset* .. 13 of 21 *trading* days ( 61.90% )
Historical Short Volume Data for CTIX
btw here's what Friday's data showed .. for avgs and YOY .. note the 90 day avgs
for almost 3 months ago vs last trading .. 10 day avgs are much easier to *work*
Detailed Quote:IPIX
INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS INC
0.9599Up 0.0099 (1.04 %)AS OF 3:54:35PM ET 06/30/2017
Last Trade 0.9599
Trade Time 3:54:35pm ET
Change 0.0099
% Change 1.04%
Open 0.935
Day High 0.96
Day Low 0.905
Previous Close
06/29/2017 0.95
52-Week High
11/22/2016 1.505
52-Week Low
05/10/2017 0.63
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
06/29/2017 -29.10%
Volume 114,484
Volume (10 day Average) 316,297 ** ..
Volume (90 day Average) 274,545
just me perhaps ..since i believe NR *perverts* stats they have to report (they
are called *SROs* for a reason .. stands for self regulating) on many OTC co.s
that have come public via a R/M .. i actually expect FTDs to have to be *reported*
on IPIX in the back half of 2017 ..
which will shut up some and create others *there* .. interchangeables reign
but educated retail investors (respective caveats met) can both outlast and
work off of NRs' *efforts* ..
hope your weekend is going well ..
4kids
this is *classic* .. (comments from *there*) by a mutually coordinated thumbs' downer for both of us *here* ..
Quote:we have no significant failures to deliver. period. that should be the end of abusive naked short theory. it's not,.... why?
btw this to me is classic troll conditioning .. reason being is that the *assumption*
er .. given .. is that the SEC actually gives a damn about the *transparency* on
any OTC stock that still exists ( survives ) due to originally coming public via a R/M into a previously used *shell* for a company that already was exterminated
note the OTC stox that have come public via S1 Registrations .. do *trigger* FTDs
as a reminder for those observing this ping pong match .. this is what the SEC
notes re: FTDs (failures to deliver re: what is termed hard locates .. in other words *shares*)
Pursuant to Rule 203(b)(3) of Regulation SHO and FINRA Rule 4320, a participant of a registered clearing agency (i.e., a clearing firm), that has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency (i.e., National Securities Clearing Corporation) in a Threshold Security for 13 consecutive settlement days must immediately close out that fail to deliver position by purchasing shares of like kind and quantity . (Please click the below Information icon for more details about the Threshold Security).
http://otce.finra.org/RegSHO
and of course this ..
REG SHO Overview
As defined in Rule 203(c)(6) of Regulation SHO, a “threshold security” is any equity security of any issuer that is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act (commonly referred to as reporting securities), where, for five consecutive settlement days:
There are aggregate fails to deliver at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more per security;
The level of fails is equal to at least one-half of one percent of the issuer’s total shares outstanding; and
The security is included on a list published by a self-regulatory organization (SRO).
A security ceases to be a threshold security if it does not exceed the specified level of fails for five consecutive settlement days .
rule 203 pertains to any company that is fully compliant .. ie they file (which of
course is Innovation Pharma)
4320 pertains to those OTC companies that *selectively* file .. in other words
not IPIX (or CTIX) which is/are OTCQB .. and if one wants to think of it this way
the more transparent .. the more *stress* is revealed which is why hedge funds
and their minions don't want this data *understood* .. because it isn't rocket science
but in the aggregate NR (non retail) can only roll an IOU so long with mgmt's
ability to execute .. (outlast them) .. reminder NR is used to controlling outcomes
when it comes to OTC stox .. (usually poorly watched with less than aware
mgmt teams)
i've shown since 5.10.17's incredibly stupid 52 week low *reset* .. by NR
just how revealing NRs' *stress* is since then .. or as i call it their *struggle*
( edit .. to save another post ... it's also why NR has had to morph up the *legal*
short since the EO April 2017 on IPIX/CTIX from approx 800,000 to 1.2M~)
and because the vehicle of choice doesn't allow for back and forth to *show*
what is done on other OTC stox .. this ? can't be asked back to mr. thumbs down
how is it a fully compliant OTCQB stock that came public via an S1 Registration
in April 2015 .. has triggered 7 rounds (mark my words since i do know this stuff
8th is en route *shortly* pun intended) .. since the EO April 2015 .. (4 in 2015
and 3 *so far* in 2017)
the board there .. like all
of that site's *boards* is littered with trolls .. pushing in this case .. the negative
because of course actual *shares* are needed and how is it of those 7 rounds
of FTDs (last one ended last month) .. that 13 days came and went ..
sans *buy ins* as is supposed to be *done* as noted by the SEC ..
.. for at least 3 of those 7 rounds .. which had 17 .. 19 and 23 days of FTDs
yeah .. the SEC isn't worth the paper their *mandate* is written on .. because
they are a paper tiger
as for the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation .. it's a beyond *clever*
TOU utilized to suit which ever *side* ..
.. of NRs' cycles of money .. is needed NR works cycles of money both UP and DOWN
btw .. here's why we both can see *stress* in play since 5.10.2017 on IPIX ..
reminder .. of what *avgs* showed then .. cause volume also matters in conjunction with what the daily tape of trades' reveals
====
Detailed Quote:CTIX
CELLCEUTIX CORPORATION
0.66Down -0.005 (-0.75 %)AS OF 3:57:19PM ET 05/10/2017
Last Trade 0.66
Trade Time 3:57:19pm ET
Change -0.005
% Change -0.75%
Open 0.656
Day High 0.67
Day Low 0.63 ** 52 week low reset again
Previous Close
05/09/2017 0.665
52-Week High
05/24/2016 1.73
52-Week Low
05/10/2017 0.63
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
05/09/2017 -59.20%
Volume 354,688 * vol done in a tightly held 4c *pps range* ..
Volume (10 day Average) 139,522 ** note prior 10 days' *efforts* on less vol
Volume (90 day Average) 278,652
ok and here's what *stress* looks like from NRs' POV .. count the days over 30%
(reminder this site does not include t trades .. which bypass daily reg sho %s)
since ticker/cusip change out (good job Leo) .. 13 out of 15 trading days ..
that is 86.66%
Historical Short Volume Data for IPIX
Date Close High Low Volume Sht Vol % of Vol Shtd
Jun 29 NA NA NA 357,758 63,054 17.62%
Jun 28 NA NA NA 402,068 170,154 42.32%
Jun 27 NA NA NA 339,385 141,570 41.71%
Jun 26 NA NA NA 719,890 449,916 62.50%
Jun 23 NA NA NA 272,027 98,558 36.23%
Jun 22 NA NA NA 191,579 64,301 33.56%
Jun 21 NA NA NA 284,072 155,270 54.66%
Jun 20 NA NA NA 188,080 100,264 53.31%
Jun 19 NA NA NA 112,174 34,556 30.81%
Jun 16 NA NA NA 287,610 103,325 35.93%
Jun 15 NA NA NA 224,876 54,557 24.26%
Jun 14 NA NA NA 840,035 271,279 32.29%
Jun 13 NA NA NA 181,406 83,288 45.91%
Jun 12 NA NA NA 470,434 145,836 31.00%
Jun 09 NA NA NA 133,755 54,956 41.09%
and b4 that .. just from the *last reset* .. 13 of 21 *trading* days ( 61.90% )
Historical Short Volume Data for CTIX
Date Close High Low Volume Sht Vol % of Vol Shtd
Jun 08 NA NA NA 409,247 141,580 34.60%
Jun 07 NA NA NA 146,839 73,961 50.37%
Jun 06 NA NA NA 333,855 80,471 24.10%
Jun 05 NA NA NA 179,944 35,587 19.78%
Jun 02 NA NA NA 265,751 64,719 24.35%
Jun 01 NA NA NA 399,456 154,521 38.68%
May 31 NA NA NA 191,959 32,102 16.72%
May 30 NA NA NA 217,484 29,632 13.62%
May 26 NA NA NA 292,116 71,544 24.49%
May 25 NA NA NA 274,005 99,539 36.33%
May 24 NA NA NA 454,447 225,351 49.59%
May 23 NA NA NA 607,936 270,190 44.44%
May 22 NA NA NA 327,770 181,148 55.27%
May 19 NA NA NA 213,550 110,861 51.91%
May 18 NA NA NA 106,762 24,699 23.13%
May 17 NA NA NA 62,403 22,410 35.91%
May 16 NA NA NA 453,269 176,254 38.89%
May 15 NA NA NA 547,948 224,198 40.92%
May 12 NA NA NA 202,384 78,408 38.74%
May 11 NA NA NA 84,656 15,500 18.31%
May 10 NA NA NA 354,688 161,021 45.40%
btw here's what Friday's data showed .. for avgs and YOY .. note the 90 day avgs
for almost 3 months ago vs last trading .. 10 day avgs are much easier to *work*
Detailed Quote:IPIX
INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS INC
0.9599Up 0.0099 (1.04 %)AS OF 3:54:35PM ET 06/30/2017
Last Trade 0.9599
Trade Time 3:54:35pm ET
Change 0.0099
% Change 1.04%
Open 0.935
Day High 0.96
Day Low 0.905
Previous Close
06/29/2017 0.95
52-Week High
11/22/2016 1.505
52-Week Low
05/10/2017 0.63
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
06/29/2017 -29.10%
Volume 114,484
Volume (10 day Average) 316,297 ** ..
Volume (90 day Average) 274,545
just me perhaps ..since i believe NR *perverts* stats they have to report (they
are called *SROs* for a reason .. stands for self regulating) on many OTC co.s
that have come public via a R/M .. i actually expect FTDs to have to be *reported*
on IPIX in the back half of 2017 ..
which will shut up some and create others *there* .. interchangeables reign
but educated retail investors (respective caveats met) can both outlast and
work off of NRs' *efforts* ..
hope your weekend is going well ..
4kids
5
1
