My guess is that of the 1.5 million shares traded
Post# of 72440
Look at the small volume days we have of around 100-150 shares, and you'll see where I get my guesstimate.
Why do I think there were more naked short shares before the CUSIP change than got re-shorted afterward?
Because the shorts who were forced to cover had a TAXABLE EVENT, and quarterly estimated taxes were due shortly thereafter. They were forced to take their profits, and then pay Uncle Sam his share.
I hope that scottsmith and the other members of various gangs realize that there is a paper trail which CANNOT be covered up -- because there is now a record that the IRS will have. When they are sued, discovery will allow those suing them to access those records.
In any event, I consider the new name to be a great improvement over the unpronounceable Cellceutix and it was worthwhile to do the name change.