Show me once where I have defamed the company. Bei
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 829)
Posted On: 04/29/2017 4:12:41 PM
Re: Ragz2Richez #18786
Show me once where I have defamed the company. Being objective and critical of decisions, moves, announcements, etc is not anywhere CLOSE to defamation.
Extortion...? Another word you dont understand. Where was the extortion? You want me to leave and go away. I was told by Mag that he was going to bring me an offer for my shares from the company months and months ago when the PPS was significantly higher. I also gave him a starting point for negotiation. The "offer" you quoted below is pure satire and was thus ignored. If the company/affiliates do not want me to share my opinions, criticisms, or objective analysis - they can make an offer for my shares as can you and I will go away. The NDA keeps parties from discussing any terms of the settlement after the fact. I gave you a starting point for the negotiation - where the stock was trading when IR/Muse started the $0.01 PPS. That for me is when the company/IR lost legitimacy.
So - go ahead - explain where defamation or extortion occurred. I expect the same sort of evidence and proof that you produced for the 56MM shares. In any defamation case - one must prove not only damages but ALSO the libelous or slanderous proof. In either - truth has been and always will be the ultimate defense. Along those lines - you should be signficantly more concerned with the libelous claims made against me.
Extortion...? Another word you dont understand. Where was the extortion? You want me to leave and go away. I was told by Mag that he was going to bring me an offer for my shares from the company months and months ago when the PPS was significantly higher. I also gave him a starting point for negotiation. The "offer" you quoted below is pure satire and was thus ignored. If the company/affiliates do not want me to share my opinions, criticisms, or objective analysis - they can make an offer for my shares as can you and I will go away. The NDA keeps parties from discussing any terms of the settlement after the fact. I gave you a starting point for the negotiation - where the stock was trading when IR/Muse started the $0.01 PPS. That for me is when the company/IR lost legitimacy.
So - go ahead - explain where defamation or extortion occurred. I expect the same sort of evidence and proof that you produced for the 56MM shares. In any defamation case - one must prove not only damages but ALSO the libelous or slanderous proof. In either - truth has been and always will be the ultimate defense. Along those lines - you should be signficantly more concerned with the libelous claims made against me.
(1)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼