I think part of the reason why so many people get
Post# of 96892
(Total Views: 292)
Posted On: 03/27/2017 7:15:07 AM
I think part of the reason why so many people get overly defensive about my questions is that they realize the questions I have asked on here (and to IR) are, in actuality, extremely important, and would have to be answered or disseminated by ACTUAL filing companies. We all expect NTEK to become an actual, filing company, right? Also, the answers would indicate whether officers (or the wife of the most important person within the company) are keeping their shares for the future.
Why is this important?
It would indicate better results are just over the horizon...or not. They may want to keep it quiet (that they sold) since they realize it is a very long road ahead. I don't know. That's why I think it is important to ask.
So, then, how do we fix this? Well, I think shareholders should contact IR and try to find out the truth.
This goes back to my previous post about accepting ignorance of the workings of our company as normalcy. If I may use Lajet's last post as an example:
FACT: No one here knows the answers to your fixation of how many shares are currently owned by 'any' Foley or CEO Dr. Ivan Gulas or any employee ... so unfortunately, you'll just have to remain "disgruntled" ... that's a tough blow !
I think we SHOULD be able to know, considering how many hurdles we have had to overcome over the years (with Foley going to jail, Riordan’s endless dilution and golf games every day by a certain individual using money provided by shareholders via dilution). I don't want to remain disgruntled and I would think most of us feel the same way.
Also, I did make a mistake using the title Dr. instead of Mr. in reference to David Foley. But then I wasn’t too upset since DennyD had made a point of showing that initially IR extended their questions to Ivan Gulas but then those questions were hijacked by Mr. Foley; so, in effect, it may have been a nice play on words!
In summation, if people want to remain aloof, the company will NEVER have any incentive to change for the better. So, ask Mr. Foley for some answers. Even if he never provides them, it still will keep him on his feet to disseminate as much information as possible.
I think we all know how he feels about small, regular investors. It has been shown on this site and I have experienced it as well in relation to my questions to him.
Why is this important?
It would indicate better results are just over the horizon...or not. They may want to keep it quiet (that they sold) since they realize it is a very long road ahead. I don't know. That's why I think it is important to ask.
So, then, how do we fix this? Well, I think shareholders should contact IR and try to find out the truth.
This goes back to my previous post about accepting ignorance of the workings of our company as normalcy. If I may use Lajet's last post as an example:
FACT: No one here knows the answers to your fixation of how many shares are currently owned by 'any' Foley or CEO Dr. Ivan Gulas or any employee ... so unfortunately, you'll just have to remain "disgruntled" ... that's a tough blow !
I think we SHOULD be able to know, considering how many hurdles we have had to overcome over the years (with Foley going to jail, Riordan’s endless dilution and golf games every day by a certain individual using money provided by shareholders via dilution). I don't want to remain disgruntled and I would think most of us feel the same way.
Also, I did make a mistake using the title Dr. instead of Mr. in reference to David Foley. But then I wasn’t too upset since DennyD had made a point of showing that initially IR extended their questions to Ivan Gulas but then those questions were hijacked by Mr. Foley; so, in effect, it may have been a nice play on words!
In summation, if people want to remain aloof, the company will NEVER have any incentive to change for the better. So, ask Mr. Foley for some answers. Even if he never provides them, it still will keep him on his feet to disseminate as much information as possible.
I think we all know how he feels about small, regular investors. It has been shown on this site and I have experienced it as well in relation to my questions to him.
(1)
(0)