I said from the start 2 years or less due to resig
Post# of 65629
It's still an open question as to which comes first.
.
The differences in the quantity of lying as between Clinton and Trump were measureable and it wasn't even a close call.
And no, Obama would not have punched down even it was legal, and assuming he didn't fall down the WH stairs and lose the contents of his Constitutional Law classes lobe.
Pence would be a 'placeholder' who could not possibly successfully defend his defense of a disgraced GOP president
Nor could the wider GOP put a good face on the 'Trump Era' and on their complicity in it.
Quote:
But this guy.... this guy goes well beyond Clinton's lies. His are exactly what that article claims. paranoia, delusions of grandeur, megalomania, scare tactics to keep his own following in a reality TV induced coma. It's all mixed in.
I said two years for impeachment tops. I believe Comey's statements that there was no proof of wire tapping, and we know Obama didn't have time for that shit, besides would waste his energy tapping that guy, may bring him down much sooner.
Possible treason for potential links to Russia. Lying to the American people about spying on him the night before the election, the Emoluments clause. It's all going to come to a head, IMO.
I have no idea who would take his place, but this guy has made a total mockery of the White House.
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4426...z4bu7lYlwb