Good morning Micro,
First off, lets make something clear. I have never been banned from IH. Second I have never posted on IH under ANY other name. And I have NEVER worked with or for NNLX.
Lets go down the list, shall we.
1) BB promised shareholder meetings. Haven't had any.
2) BB promised BOD elections. Haven't had any. But yes, I would run for a BOD position if he ever did have elections. BOD's are put in place to provide sober-second-thought on the decisions made by the Mgt. of a company and provide guidance to a company when Mgt. doesn't do that.
It would appear the BOD is NOT doing this. I guess it's hard for them when the BOD is chaired by the CEO himself and the BOD is made up of the CEO's old buddies.
3) NO distraction. Just offering an honest opinion of the way this company is run. NOT talking about the product at all.
4) No hostile takeover intended, at least not by me. And I'm not trying to destroy the company as you claim.
5) I would assume that by the tone of your post that you are attempting to provide cool-aid relief to the masses and YOU are the one trying to make a distraction to defer actual facts on how this company is/has been run.
6) If you are going to have my post pulled (calling it an attack) you might as well have your own post pulled under the same claim.
Have a fine day.
All in my opinion, as always
First off, lets make something clear. I have never been banned from IH. Second I have never posted on IH under ANY other name. And I have NEVER worked with or for NNLX.
Lets go down the list, shall we.
1) BB promised shareholder meetings. Haven't had any.
2) BB promised BOD elections. Haven't had any. But yes, I would run for a BOD position if he ever did have elections. BOD's are put in place to provide sober-second-thought on the decisions made by the Mgt. of a company and provide guidance to a company when Mgt. doesn't do that.
It would appear the BOD is NOT doing this. I guess it's hard for them when the BOD is chaired by the CEO himself and the BOD is made up of the CEO's old buddies.
3) NO distraction. Just offering an honest opinion of the way this company is run. NOT talking about the product at all.
4) No hostile takeover intended, at least not by me. And I'm not trying to destroy the company as you claim.
5) I would assume that by the tone of your post that you are attempting to provide cool-aid relief to the masses and YOU are the one trying to make a distraction to defer actual facts on how this company is/has been run.
6) If you are going to have my post pulled (calling it an attack) you might as well have your own post pulled under the same claim.
Have a fine day.
All in my opinion, as always
3
6
