NOAD I understand the business model. I don't thin
Post# of 7801
(Total Views: 100)
Posted On: 03/07/2017 7:08:05 AM
Re: northofadollar #3134
NOAD I understand the business model. I don't think it's a good one based on the sentiment at the FBAR, but that's my opinion.
That said, the business model isn't my issue here, it's the documented false statements I believe were intentional because most have never been corrected. The only ones that have been is the description of the 2014 permit in SEC filings. For about a year they referred to that permit as a recovery permit, which was false.
Now how did their star witness come up with the false 3 item claim and post it nearly 2 weeks before it was PR? Mary told Kyle the news was false.
What about the unnamed archaeologist finding gold coins on Area 2 that Sinclair knows nothing about?
Poster jrf posted Kyle told him they wouldn't need another permit. That was right after the 2014 permit was issued. Longs were posting........80/20 and salvage rights, which was false. SFRX even filed those false claims, refuted by Mary, with the Court.
The original complaint was posted here before it could even be ordered from Hillsborough Co which suggest insiders are posting here and elsewhere.
And then they attempt to have the Defendant jailed by claiming "alleged" private messages on Facebook were posts on Ihub. Huffman told Gregg he needed more and when he couldn't get it he filed the motion anyway and LIED about the exhibits. Is that not sick?
It's not the business model, it's the people behind it and their actions.
There are other examples, but aren't these enough to raise ones eyebrows?
That said, the business model isn't my issue here, it's the documented false statements I believe were intentional because most have never been corrected. The only ones that have been is the description of the 2014 permit in SEC filings. For about a year they referred to that permit as a recovery permit, which was false.
Now how did their star witness come up with the false 3 item claim and post it nearly 2 weeks before it was PR? Mary told Kyle the news was false.
What about the unnamed archaeologist finding gold coins on Area 2 that Sinclair knows nothing about?
Poster jrf posted Kyle told him they wouldn't need another permit. That was right after the 2014 permit was issued. Longs were posting........80/20 and salvage rights, which was false. SFRX even filed those false claims, refuted by Mary, with the Court.
The original complaint was posted here before it could even be ordered from Hillsborough Co which suggest insiders are posting here and elsewhere.
And then they attempt to have the Defendant jailed by claiming "alleged" private messages on Facebook were posts on Ihub. Huffman told Gregg he needed more and when he couldn't get it he filed the motion anyway and LIED about the exhibits. Is that not sick?
It's not the business model, it's the people behind it and their actions.
There are other examples, but aren't these enough to raise ones eyebrows?
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼