False equivalence, again. Nothing you've stated
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 64)
Posted On: 01/23/2017 6:26:56 PM
False equivalence, again.
Nothing you've stated undermines either CNN's polling methodology nor the other polling that supports the same distribution, presumably using slightly different samples and methodology.
You've presented nothing that persuasively invalidates the data.
How many of the polling methodologies shown here have you overlooked? http://abcnews.go.com/US/PollVault/abc-news-p...?id=145373
So the points that I made remain, 'undisturbed' LOL!
Nothing you've stated undermines either CNN's polling methodology nor the other polling that supports the same distribution, presumably using slightly different samples and methodology.
You've presented nothing that persuasively invalidates the data.
How many of the polling methodologies shown here have you overlooked? http://abcnews.go.com/US/PollVault/abc-news-p...?id=145373
So the points that I made remain, 'undisturbed' LOL!
Quote:
and that is why these so called methods need to be drastically changed... if to be taken seriously.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼