Regarding the 30,000,000 shares.. It isn't Lisa
Post# of 96879
Posted On: 12/15/2016 9:50:17 AM
Regarding the 30,000,000 shares..
It isn't Lisa's; it's David's in Lisa's name.
David and Lisa have learned their lessons. from now on, Lisa will hold the families assets in her name. People who decide to F**k with David won't bankrupt the family; and Lisa will not be a signer to any documents.
Personally, after going from 82,000,000 shares to 140,000,000, I am happy to learn that 30,000,000 of them had nothing to do with raising a few dollars to pay for pencils in the office. The future will decide whether or not 30,000,000 shares invested in David is a good idea. It won't take much for us to be happy about stuff like this; and what would have been a more fair number - 15,000,000???? 10.00 per share and no one is counting anymore.
I would also like to learn how many of the remaining 28,000,000 shares were directed into employees hands, or used to pay for our system upgrades....
Paul
It isn't Lisa's; it's David's in Lisa's name.
David and Lisa have learned their lessons. from now on, Lisa will hold the families assets in her name. People who decide to F**k with David won't bankrupt the family; and Lisa will not be a signer to any documents.
Personally, after going from 82,000,000 shares to 140,000,000, I am happy to learn that 30,000,000 of them had nothing to do with raising a few dollars to pay for pencils in the office. The future will decide whether or not 30,000,000 shares invested in David is a good idea. It won't take much for us to be happy about stuff like this; and what would have been a more fair number - 15,000,000???? 10.00 per share and no one is counting anymore.
I would also like to learn how many of the remaining 28,000,000 shares were directed into employees hands, or used to pay for our system upgrades....
Paul
(7)
(0)Nanotech Entertainment Inc. (NTEK) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼