Some have asked me privately why I condemned the "so called" due diligence presented on the MMTE Ijunk board, and so I will post a public answer to this question.
On the MMTE Ijunk board, the so called due diligence mostly presented was far closer to propaganda than it was to real due diligence in my opinion. One must be part of the group-think mentality, or your post would be removed. In my own case, I posted first hand correspondence directly from William Lieberman that did not correspond with this group-think mentality, and so it was removed, and my posts were deemed part of some sinister agenda to acquire more shares on the cheap. This, of course, was never true, but why let truth get in the way?
I also objected to the posts that said certain things were "guaranteed" and "certain." I publicly stated that such definitive statements should never be made because one never knows for certain what may happen. Naturally, this statement was roundly condemned. In addition, I posted what William Lieberman told me about NOS and his brother STA. I even posted the entire e-mails with trailers and headers to prove William did in fact tell me there things.
When I served as moderator on the Google group board, DiiDii and I were told not to trust NOS, but when I later returned to the Ijunk board after my wife recovered from her illness, and tried to remind investors there of William's opinion of him, I again was condemned. This seemed very strange to me, since so many pinned their hope and money on what he posted regarding his so called private meetings and personal talks with Lieberman. I really don't need to post more about this, but many people invested much more than they should have because of what he told them.
