It's pretty simple, UltraFlix is able to deliver 4K at a much lower speed than their competitors.
With that in mind, think about the formula to store and distribute the media? If they are able to deliver media at a lower Mbps (Megabit-per-second) then that means their formula or "secret sauce" can save a lot of money for the company in the long run. Reducing costs of server space and delivery methods are the key. Imagine this model on a much larger scale.
That is why we are hearing about the 75% reduction in cost, because that is a big part of their business model IMO. It makes business sense for the company to get bought out IMO even though they have communicated to us at the last SHM that they have no interest in selling the company (at this stage).
Delivering a superior product at a low rate alone makes them a buyout candidate IMO.
With that in mind, think about the formula to store and distribute the media? If they are able to deliver media at a lower Mbps (Megabit-per-second) then that means their formula or "secret sauce" can save a lot of money for the company in the long run. Reducing costs of server space and delivery methods are the key. Imagine this model on a much larger scale.
That is why we are hearing about the 75% reduction in cost, because that is a big part of their business model IMO. It makes business sense for the company to get bought out IMO even though they have communicated to us at the last SHM that they have no interest in selling the company (at this stage).
Delivering a superior product at a low rate alone makes them a buyout candidate IMO.
4
1
