1) There is no reason (and it is not expensive to

1) There is no reason (and it is not expensive to the company) that BB, can't have a CC meeting. A live CC meeting where the CEO would give an update to what the company has done and is doing. Followed by a live call-in from investors. I have participated in a few of these with different companies. So your point is moot.
2) As far as your reasoning for keeping the patents in his name - NNLX ALREADY has a poison pill program in effect. Having the patents in the companies name would not put the company in jeopardy of a hostile take over as it is already protected BY the poison pill. And would add value to the company.
3) The exclusive license you speak of is fine. Except for the fact there is NO written contract with firm fixed dates for beginning and ending of the exclusivity. Therefore the exclusive nature of the contract could be terminated at the CEO/patent holders discretion.
4) BOD's are suppose to be put in place as a guardian for the shareholders. As was stated by BB, years ago there WOULD be Shareholder meetings "AND" BOD elections. There have been none that I am aware of.
5) As I have stated in my previous posts. I view N-Assay as a good thing and am not trying to distract from it.
6) WHAT REVENGE?????