Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Message Board

1) There is no reason (and it is not expensive to

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 9144
Posted On: 11/19/2016 12:33:58 AM
Posted By: elsiesyouraunt
Re: microcaps #2706
1) There is no reason (and it is not expensive to the company) that BB, can't have a CC meeting. A live CC meeting where the CEO would give an update to what the company has done and is doing. Followed by a live call-in from investors. I have participated in a few of these with different companies. So your point is moot.
2) As far as your reasoning for keeping the patents in his name - NNLX ALREADY has a poison pill program in effect. Having the patents in the companies name would not put the company in jeopardy of a hostile take over as it is already protected BY the poison pill. And would add value to the company.
3) The exclusive license you speak of is fine. Except for the fact there is NO written contract with firm fixed dates for beginning and ending of the exclusivity. Therefore the exclusive nature of the contract could be terminated at the CEO/patent holders discretion.
4) BOD's are suppose to be put in place as a guardian for the shareholders. As was stated by BB, years ago there WOULD be Shareholder meetings "AND" BOD elections. There have been none that I am aware of.
5) As I have stated in my previous posts. I view N-Assay as a good thing and am not trying to distract from it.
6) WHAT REVENGE?????


(5)
(4)




Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us