Elsie, That is an interesting set of viewpoints

Elsie,

That is an interesting set of viewpoints. Are you a disgruntled former employee of NanoLogix? The published paper appears to indicate the opposite of what you state. I read the notation of the research being partially funded by NanoLogix. I suppose the production workers and other staff at NanoLogix must've been responsible for that initiative. Or our CEO might not be the incompetent you claim. Your time after time cliché doesn't look sound here.

I have read every existing press release and news update available in the NanoLogix archives and I don't see any "---shall we say--" reference to opportunities to form partnerships with "the big boys" anywhere. There was a cancelled agreement with some Kuwait company that was supposed to distribute some products and agreements with a Saudi Arabia company and a Singapore company to also distribute, with additional news about approvals of some sort in each country, but that's all that even approaches any definition of "partnership" I can find.

Your psychological analysis is rip-snorting hilarious. Remind the group to buy you a mirror for Christmas so that you can enjoy months of entertainment.

Please enlighten us on how a small penny stock company could form a partnership with a big boy for anything other than this new N-Assay. Petri plates are not a dime a dozen, but I think they're not something that draws the "big boys".

Scott