You err on so many fronts it would be a terrific effort to correct your mistakes. Bill may very well be overseas but his initial statements as to the earning potential of CEN in Canada were obviously overstated.
You and others, continue to put forth arguments regarding Lakeshore and Health Canada without backing up your position. With all due respect, please show where Lakeshore was culpable. Yes there were public pronouncements made by elected officials but, it would be the same as you stating publicly you are going to get your drivers license, buy a car, and then fail to apply to get a license to drive. You think making a public statement is the same as satisfying local ordinances is the same thing? I don't believe for a moment you would believe that. You know and I know the company fell short in that area. You know and I know the zoning was correct for growing, but not for processing and therein lies the rub. They can produce they just cannot ship the amounts required to reach the earnings Bill touted. That is the bottom line. It was in a Value Added zone. Look it up. It was not retroactive, it was in that zone from day one and Bill's cousin Jim would have known that since he three times tried, but failed to get that zoning changed.
If the OMB had ruled in Bills favour, and I saw no reason to see they would not, the company still would have been required, as Bill confirmed, a zoning amendment would have been necessary. I agree to a point the town retroactively changed the rules but Bill also neglected to tell investors of the restrictions in place. That fact is indisputable. The package delivered at the close of business prior to the council meeting was the zoning amendment application. So ask one important question and be honest as an adult who takes responsibility for their actions and viewpoints. Here is the question.
Why in January and right through to June of 2014 did Bill continue to state zoning was not an issue and then in July he quietly, without stating publicly he had done so, apply for a zoning amendment? We never knew he had done so until the September meeting of council when it was declared he had indeed filed a deficient zoning amendment application .
So why the reverse of position without public acknowledgement. Bill never does things quietly. This time he did. It is a matter of public record.
And Bill could have as was suggested by his high powered New York public relations firm, opened the doors and shown the grow op as many others had done without being penalized by Health Canada. It was suggested by his firm he do so, he refused. At that time the Globe and Mail was not hostile, they were simply asking to see what many others had done - shown the public in a non-promotional manner the facility. That was September of 2014. He stated in May it was complete so why not show it. Nothing to do with secrets or lack of compliance. In fact at that time he was not even licensed so opening the doors to a grow op facility, with no pot being shown, was easy. It could have been growing strawberries. So why did he choose not to? Others had.
If the facility was built as he claimed, what happened to the equipment. Why were shareholders not told what happened to the equipment and where it is now. Those are material facts. They should have been disclosed.
Lots of questions but little in the way of answers from you lot.
You and others, continue to put forth arguments regarding Lakeshore and Health Canada without backing up your position. With all due respect, please show where Lakeshore was culpable. Yes there were public pronouncements made by elected officials but, it would be the same as you stating publicly you are going to get your drivers license, buy a car, and then fail to apply to get a license to drive. You think making a public statement is the same as satisfying local ordinances is the same thing? I don't believe for a moment you would believe that. You know and I know the company fell short in that area. You know and I know the zoning was correct for growing, but not for processing and therein lies the rub. They can produce they just cannot ship the amounts required to reach the earnings Bill touted. That is the bottom line. It was in a Value Added zone. Look it up. It was not retroactive, it was in that zone from day one and Bill's cousin Jim would have known that since he three times tried, but failed to get that zoning changed.
If the OMB had ruled in Bills favour, and I saw no reason to see they would not, the company still would have been required, as Bill confirmed, a zoning amendment would have been necessary. I agree to a point the town retroactively changed the rules but Bill also neglected to tell investors of the restrictions in place. That fact is indisputable. The package delivered at the close of business prior to the council meeting was the zoning amendment application. So ask one important question and be honest as an adult who takes responsibility for their actions and viewpoints. Here is the question.
Why in January and right through to June of 2014 did Bill continue to state zoning was not an issue and then in July he quietly, without stating publicly he had done so, apply for a zoning amendment? We never knew he had done so until the September meeting of council when it was declared he had indeed filed a deficient zoning amendment application .
So why the reverse of position without public acknowledgement. Bill never does things quietly. This time he did. It is a matter of public record.
And Bill could have as was suggested by his high powered New York public relations firm, opened the doors and shown the grow op as many others had done without being penalized by Health Canada. It was suggested by his firm he do so, he refused. At that time the Globe and Mail was not hostile, they were simply asking to see what many others had done - shown the public in a non-promotional manner the facility. That was September of 2014. He stated in May it was complete so why not show it. Nothing to do with secrets or lack of compliance. In fact at that time he was not even licensed so opening the doors to a grow op facility, with no pot being shown, was easy. It could have been growing strawberries. So why did he choose not to? Others had.
If the facility was built as he claimed, what happened to the equipment. Why were shareholders not told what happened to the equipment and where it is now. Those are material facts. They should have been disclosed.
Lots of questions but little in the way of answers from you lot.
People always ask what my name means. Very easy. Stamford Connecticut Very Interesting. The place is chock full of history.
