Many of your own party leaders strongly disagree with your sentiment. They feel the world would be a more dangerous place with Donald Trump as President as compared to Hillary Clinton. He has proven time and again that he has zero filter between his brain and his mouth and it generally tends to land him in controversy. Many leaders from other countries have the same concerns. A reckless, careless, unapologetic leader is not what is needed in the White House, it will simply destabilize foreign regions and create further security risks to the United States. This isn't coming from me, this is coming from top Republicans. The apologists can refute it all they want, refuting the facts does not change them.
The words "DEAD" and "destruction" are highly embellished and dramatized. Clinton, should she even win will not destroy the Country. However, an autocrat can have a much more detrimental affect. We can agree to disagree.
(1)
(0)