"but i also know from first hand experience re: di
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 06/21/2016 4:03:53 PM
"but i also know from first hand experience re: disruptive techs that *evolve* to become *the norm* (1 to 2 decades from into adoption to mainstream reality)"
You investors are being misled. Even technologies which aren't disruptive but have a positive value can be put into use very quickly. A decade or two for a disruptive technology which can supposedly turn waste into diesel at high gross margins but which, bizarrely, nobody feels any pressure to put into service??!! No way.
Ask 4kids which first hand experience she had with a disruptive technology but which took a decade or two to get off the ground. Then google that technology and ask her what sad story led to that technology dying on the vine. 50:1 odds says she simply made that up. Her time line is ridiculous.
Mr. Heddle isn't being "methodical" in taking three years while having yet to accomplish anything...he's literally not doing anything related to PTOI. Ask Mr. Heddle how many potential customers he's contacted over the past three years. He won't give you any numbers because he would anticipate the next question being, "What reason do all of these potential customers give for not wanting to buy a processor?"
Watch out for your fellow longs who try to pacify you into thinking a decade is a short time to get a disruptive technology put into productive service and who try to re-focus your attention on unknown colluding entities who supposedly are the 'real' culprits. PTOI's lack of results is entirely based on its own lack of merit, not because of outside nefarious forces which are supposedly trying to kill the company.
You investors are being misled. Even technologies which aren't disruptive but have a positive value can be put into use very quickly. A decade or two for a disruptive technology which can supposedly turn waste into diesel at high gross margins but which, bizarrely, nobody feels any pressure to put into service??!! No way.
Ask 4kids which first hand experience she had with a disruptive technology but which took a decade or two to get off the ground. Then google that technology and ask her what sad story led to that technology dying on the vine. 50:1 odds says she simply made that up. Her time line is ridiculous.
Mr. Heddle isn't being "methodical" in taking three years while having yet to accomplish anything...he's literally not doing anything related to PTOI. Ask Mr. Heddle how many potential customers he's contacted over the past three years. He won't give you any numbers because he would anticipate the next question being, "What reason do all of these potential customers give for not wanting to buy a processor?"
Watch out for your fellow longs who try to pacify you into thinking a decade is a short time to get a disruptive technology put into productive service and who try to re-focus your attention on unknown colluding entities who supposedly are the 'real' culprits. PTOI's lack of results is entirely based on its own lack of merit, not because of outside nefarious forces which are supposedly trying to kill the company.
(1)
(0)Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.