Clearly one of the iLie bashers but the bigger iss
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 06/21/2016 11:38:17 AM
Clearly one of the iLie bashers but the bigger issue remains with IR/ $TPAC -
WHY is there no PR on these SLAs and new revenue streams?
Further - why not give a time frame when forward looking guidance will be given based largely upon these new, signedsigned SLA agreements...?
As a long term investor that has purchased in the 0.0002 range all the way up to the 0.004s - i do not agree with this and the defensive posture and dancing around these gives plenty of fodder for the bashers and naysayers. Original "new path" was non PRs under $250K. Clearly $13MM is above that threshold even on an annual basis ($1.3MM per year for 10 years).
Obviously there is still a lot of doubt about the potential for these to come to fruition or else we would not be trading in the teens let alone threatening trips even with the systematic walk down. Still too many traders and not enough investors. That does NOT consequently change by only communicating to existing shareholders via emails. It requires widespread news dissemination through normal PR channels. Why NOT get this word put and protect and grow the true investor base...? Doesn't add up. Even if the selling is all MM manipulation taking out the weaker hands in the void of confidence about the long term viability of the company/SLAs - why not be more aggressive in defending shareholder value...?
Does someone have a rationale argument for NOT getting these SLA agreements out into the widespread investment community? I dont. IR is just defensive. I dont get it.
WHY is there no PR on these SLAs and new revenue streams?
Further - why not give a time frame when forward looking guidance will be given based largely upon these new, signedsigned SLA agreements...?
As a long term investor that has purchased in the 0.0002 range all the way up to the 0.004s - i do not agree with this and the defensive posture and dancing around these gives plenty of fodder for the bashers and naysayers. Original "new path" was non PRs under $250K. Clearly $13MM is above that threshold even on an annual basis ($1.3MM per year for 10 years).
Obviously there is still a lot of doubt about the potential for these to come to fruition or else we would not be trading in the teens let alone threatening trips even with the systematic walk down. Still too many traders and not enough investors. That does NOT consequently change by only communicating to existing shareholders via emails. It requires widespread news dissemination through normal PR channels. Why NOT get this word put and protect and grow the true investor base...? Doesn't add up. Even if the selling is all MM manipulation taking out the weaker hands in the void of confidence about the long term viability of the company/SLAs - why not be more aggressive in defending shareholder value...?
Does someone have a rationale argument for NOT getting these SLA agreements out into the widespread investment community? I dont. IR is just defensive. I dont get it.
(6)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼