Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Message Board

Clearly one of the iLie bashers but the bigger iss

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22940
Posted On: 06/21/2016 11:38:17 AM
Posted By: thesmalls
Re: DanH #9500
Clearly one of the iLie bashers but the bigger issue remains with IR/ $TPAC -

WHY is there no PR on these SLAs and new revenue streams?

Further - why not give a time frame when forward looking guidance will be given based largely upon these new, signedsigned SLA agreements...?

As a long term investor that has purchased in the 0.0002 range all the way up to the 0.004s - i do not agree with this and the defensive posture and dancing around these gives plenty of fodder for the bashers and naysayers. Original "new path" was non PRs under $250K. Clearly $13MM is above that threshold even on an annual basis ($1.3MM per year for 10 years).

Obviously there is still a lot of doubt about the potential for these to come to fruition or else we would not be trading in the teens let alone threatening trips even with the systematic walk down. Still too many traders and not enough investors. That does NOT consequently change by only communicating to existing shareholders via emails. It requires widespread news dissemination through normal PR channels. Why NOT get this word put and protect and grow the true investor base...? Doesn't add up. Even if the selling is all MM manipulation taking out the weaker hands in the void of confidence about the long term viability of the company/SLAs - why not be more aggressive in defending shareholder value...?

Does someone have a rationale argument for NOT getting these SLA agreements out into the widespread investment community? I dont. IR is just defensive. I dont get it.



(6)
(0)




Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us