No, Trump can’t get a Mexican American judge recused just

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (2) Message Board

Jun 3, 2016 at 9:18 PM

Quote:

No, Trump can’t get a Mexican American judge recused just because Trump wants to ‘build a wall’ to exclude illegal immigrants

By Eugene Volokh

June 3 at 4:47 PM 

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel

Donald Trump said in a Wall Street Journal interview that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel — who is hearing a case against Trump University — had an “inherent conflict of interest” because the judge is “of Mexican heritage” and Trump is urging “building a wall” to keep out illegal immigrants from Mexico (and other places).

But the legal system does not view this as a “conflict of interest” that requires a judge to recuse himself, or even counsels in favor of recusal.

First, a judge’s race, ethnicity, sex and the like aren’t grounds for recusal, even if the case directly involves questions that relate to one of those factors. Neither black nor white judges, for instance, have to recuse themselves from cases that involve alleged race discrimination by whites against blacks (or blacks against whites).

Hispanic judges don’t have to recuse themselves from immigration cases that involve Hispanics or from cases that involve constitutional law, administrative law or immigration law questions that especially bear on Hispanic immigrants.

And that’s so even when the cases directly involve issues that relate to race, ethnicity and the like. It is therefore likewise so when the cases are on neutral contract or tort questions, but the parties (or their owners or managers) have spoken out on controversial identity-related issues.

You can’t get a Hispanic judge recused just by speaking out on immigration in a way that may disproportionately displease Hispanics — just as you can’t get a white male judge recused just by criticizing white males or calling for reparations for slavery or race- and sex-based affirmative action.

Now might judges dislike — or like — certain litigants because of the litigants’ politics and how those politics bear on various groups to which the judges belong? You bet, because before anything else, judges are people. And there are indeed some rules that are aimed at preventing such judicial bias, for instance when the parties to the case are the judge’s relatives or when the judge owns stock in one of the parties. Some of these rules apply in some cases because of the possible “appearance of impropriety” that certain relationships between judges and litigants can create

But most such possibilities for judicial bias, and most things that may appear to create a risk of bias, do not justify recusal, for several (partly related) reasons:

1. Especially when it comes to political and identity issues, most judges would have some possible bias. Liberal judges may be biased against conservative litigants, but conservative ones may be biased in favor of them. Pro-immigration-from-Mexico judges (who may be disproportionately, though by no means solely, Mexican American) may be biased against Trump, but anti-immigration-from-Mexico judges (who would likely be disproportionately, though by no means solely, non-Mexican American) may be biased in favor.

To the extent black judges are more likely to sympathize with black plaintiffs suing white defendants under anti-discrimination laws, white judges are more likely to sympathize with the defendants (again, reflecting the simple reality that some such racial sympathies do exist in some measure).

2. Judges, no less than people in other jobs, are supposed to be treated equally without regard to race, sex, ethnicity, religion and the like. Concluding that Hispanic judges can’t sit in Trump cases because of their ethnicity or that Catholic judges can’t sit in abortion cases because of their religion or that female judges can’t sit in abortion cases because of their sex would wrongly deny those judges an opportunity to have a say in those cases. And that’s especially wrong since, as #1 points out, judges from groups that form a majority on the bench can’t be equally recused in those cases because then there’d be too few judges eligible to hear the cases.

3. If all it takes to get a judge thrown off the case is to say things that the judge may dislike, litigants will find it easy to manipulate their cases just by saying things.

Trump, of course, has his own political reasons for saying what he’s saying about immigration — but if Curiel has to recuse himself in this case, then the next litigant who doesn’t like Curiel’s rulings would likewise be able to get a different judge simply by echoing Trump’s statements.

Don’t like your Jewish judge? Say something anti-Semitic. Don’t like your rich judge? Talk about how evil the 1 percent are. The legal system can’t tolerate such opportunities for manipulation.

Litigants have to deal with the judges they’re dealt, even when the judge’s race, ethnicity, sex, religion, sexual orientation, political affiliation or socioeconomic status may indeed have some tendency to predispose the judge against the litigant (or in favor of the litigant’s opponents).

We demand that judges be impartial despite those factors — but, again, judges being human, it’s inevitable that some partiality will remain in some situations. It’s an imperfect system, as all human systems are. But it’s a much better system than one in which Donald Trump’s cases can only be heard by judges who have no cause to dislike Donald Trump’s opinions.

Newer

Older

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

Chemours Faces Class Action Over Fraud Allegations

Chemours and the Aftermarket Mirage When it rains, it pours, and for Chemours, the forecast isn't looking sunny. Investors are gearing up to slap Chemours Company (NYSE: CC) with a securities fraud class action. Why, you ask? Overstatement of aftermarket demand for refrigerants left investors high and dry after stock prices took an 18% nosedive. On August 4, 2026,...

Civista Welcomes Healthcare Leader to Boost Growth

Expanding the Boardroom with Healthcare Expertise In an unexpected twist for Civista Bancshares (NASDAQ: CIVB), the financial holding company is roping in some healthcare brass to its board. Jeremy Normington-Slay just snagged a seat at Civista's table, and he's bringing his tough-sledding healthcare leadership chops straight from Firelands Health. A $4.3 billion outfit...

mF International Shuts Down Legacy Business to Focus on BCH

mF International's Bold Digital Leap It’s a big move in the financial landscape when a firm decides to shake things up and pivot hard towards the digital frontier. mF International Limited (NASDAQ:MFI) is shutting the door on its legacy financial trading solutions and dedicating itself entirely to the budding world of digital assets. This isn’t just another facelift;...

Hyperliquid Expands Stock Buyback to $100 Million

Diving Into Hyperliquid's $100 Million Bold Move Let’s cut through the corporate fluff—Hyperliquid Strategies Inc. just cranked up their stock repurchase program to a cool $100 million. Yep, that’s right—the brain trust behind NASDAQ:PURR has pulled out the checkbook to buy more of its own shares. This decision, unveiled on October 23, 2026, is like tossing a...

Wisconsin Brats Clash with Florida Citrus in Marketing Showdown

A Juicy Rivalry with Sweet and Savory Stakes You ever catch yourself watching state pride turn into a marketing showdown? That's what's cookin' with Wisconsin's Johnsonville and Florida's Natural, and believe me, this isn't just about what’s on your plate. Forget the foam fingers, here it's all about the brats and the OJ. It's like the Packers versus the Dolphins, but...

Empire Steak House Expands to Delray Beach

Steakhouse Kings Bring New York Flavors to Florida When you're talking about steak, the Empire Steak House name carries some serious heft. This isn't just another restaurant chain cashing in on prime cuts; it's a family legacy over 21 years in the making. The Sinanaj Brothers, who honed their skills at Peter Luger in New York, are moving their empire south, landing a...

Galien Recognizes Kerry for Transformative Global Health Work

Kerry's Legacy: A Symbol of Global Unity In the ever-thickening jungle of geopolitics and global health, it's rare to find a beacon as steadfast as John Kerry. This year, The Galien Foundation saw fit to honor him with the 2026 Roy Vagelos Pro Bono Humanum Award for Global Health Equity. This ain't just some shiny trinket—it’s a testament to his lifetime of ripping...

Medicare Limits and Long-Term Care Planning Tips

Grappling with Medicare's Gaps Most folks hear Medicare and feel a sigh of relief—thinking it's a catch-all net for healthcare in your golden years. But hold on, when it comes to long-term care, Medicare's got more holes than Swiss cheese. Cindy Couyoumjian from Cinergy Financial lays it out pretty clear: Medicare doesn't cover what it calls 'custodial care'—you know,...

CSTS Unveils PremierX in NYC: A Bold Entertainment Move

Welcome to the New Era of Entertainment Out of the blockbusters and into the open air, eh? On October 30, 2026, CSTS Enterprises flipped the New York skyline into a canvas for their grand kickoff of PremierXTM—a live entertainment brand poised to redefine how we gobble up our music, sport, and art. Now, there's a shot of adrenaline New Yorkers weren't exactly begging...

COhatch Preps for High-Stakes Ohio Pitch Contest

Ohio Startups Gear Up for Another Fierce Faceoff You wouldn't find me betting against a hungry entrepreneur, especially with $25,000 on the line. That's the prize dangling at this year's Dublin Pitch Competition, hosted by COhatch and the City of Dublin. If there's one thing I'm certain of, it's that Ohio will see some real contenders stepping up on October 15....