imo the abusive short on PTOI is massive .. but as

imo the abusive short on PTOI is massive .. but as i've always noted
it takes *aware* mgmt teams to counter .. alongside the ability to execute

P2O has the tech and the tech works .. everyone with interest *knows it*

but it's not a 20c widget easily marketed and sales' foundations take far
longer than anyone recognizes .. i applauded ECO's
involvement .. but it allowed imo .. P2O to sit back and rely on others
for sales and marketing .. i would have handled aspects differently but
with that said only mgmt *knows* 100% of what is what .. the Update on 3.8
gave some insight into what mgmt is thinking across multiple levels and
while aspects always take longer than any of us want .. P2O investors for
the most part remain *committed* .. which was totally evident via the first
half of May's *volume* .. which roughly was just above 300,000 (in other
words .. had the CEs' not done their *volume* >> days' 11 to 13 almost
by rote << PTOI was on par for the lowest *volume* since 2009) .. add that
to Naughty Nite's record setting % reported to FINRA for April 2016 .. (79%)
and it is very clear that P2O *investors* have outlasted *FILTH* ..

the FUD aspect that is a carryover from those entities already *imploded*
via those who actively worked the cycle of money on the always targeted
OTC stox/companies .. have a problem with P2O for multiple reasons

now P2O's mgmt needs to execute .. lay a foundation that is solid
and allows CEs' zero ability re: *TAKE DOWNS*

they have a problem @ 10c/20c/35c (significant)

but the longer the CEs' go below 5c .. that then becomes an issue

*volume* (and lack of) matters ..

4kids