joey, i'm not a naysayer. i'm actually invested
Post# of 1023
Posted On: 04/25/2016 12:31:55 PM
joey, i'm not a naysayer. i'm actually invested in SCIE. but i would like to challenge a couple of your points.
1. just because SCIE has a product that works does not mean it will be a successful company and offer a return on investment for investors. a product that works does not always equate with a company plan that is successful and profitable. look at the beta vcr for example. it was better in every aspect but it was blown away by VHS vcrs. i dont believe any of your research posted deals with the day to day marketing strategy and company plan, bookkeeping, management, and finances required to ensure this company has a ROI that is attractive to us investors.
2. the wavestat4 does work, and if it were really a god-send product i think the world would be clamoring for this device and yet it hasn't happened yet. is it possible there are other competing devices and technologies and that the wavestat4 isn't the only game in town? there might be hundreds of such devices that this board has not explored yet as this board is overly focused on the analytics of the stock movement. a quick google search on "instant cancer detection" reveals there is liquid and light detection methods available. one of the light detection methods is spectroscopy, of which a company is already doing that in many countries. http://www.verisante.com/products/aura/ that is only what 2 minutes of googling gave me. i'm sure if i were to write up a report i can find many more companies offering real-time cancer detection.
anyway, from an investors point of view, this stock looks like its in a death spiral. i'm sure you can figure out a way to explain to us investors how this is a great investment no matter how low the pps gets, and when it hits triple zero it will be an even better investment, however many of us are loosing our ass and i can look the other way as well as any, but this thing is just bleeding and has all the hallmarks of a looser. i hope i'm wrong because i'm taking it on the chin right now.
1. just because SCIE has a product that works does not mean it will be a successful company and offer a return on investment for investors. a product that works does not always equate with a company plan that is successful and profitable. look at the beta vcr for example. it was better in every aspect but it was blown away by VHS vcrs. i dont believe any of your research posted deals with the day to day marketing strategy and company plan, bookkeeping, management, and finances required to ensure this company has a ROI that is attractive to us investors.
2. the wavestat4 does work, and if it were really a god-send product i think the world would be clamoring for this device and yet it hasn't happened yet. is it possible there are other competing devices and technologies and that the wavestat4 isn't the only game in town? there might be hundreds of such devices that this board has not explored yet as this board is overly focused on the analytics of the stock movement. a quick google search on "instant cancer detection" reveals there is liquid and light detection methods available. one of the light detection methods is spectroscopy, of which a company is already doing that in many countries. http://www.verisante.com/products/aura/ that is only what 2 minutes of googling gave me. i'm sure if i were to write up a report i can find many more companies offering real-time cancer detection.
anyway, from an investors point of view, this stock looks like its in a death spiral. i'm sure you can figure out a way to explain to us investors how this is a great investment no matter how low the pps gets, and when it hits triple zero it will be an even better investment, however many of us are loosing our ass and i can look the other way as well as any, but this thing is just bleeding and has all the hallmarks of a looser. i hope i'm wrong because i'm taking it on the chin right now.
(0)
(0)