"Current questions really is... does P2O's CEO by
Post# of 43064
The much, much better question would be, "Does PTOI's 'technology' work as Mr. Bordynuik represented years ago, that it uses pyrolysis of plastic to make diesel and a crude oil equivalent for under $10/bbl??"
There's a reason why PTOI is tight-lipped about the performance metrics of its flagship (not to mention the previous ones) which was collecting data two and half years ago, a reason why unnamed customers supposedly wanting 30+ processors decided they didn't want to buy even one, a reason why PTOI doesn't run the processors themselves to make all of this supposed money and a reason why, in over two years, Mr. Heddle didn't want to put any money toward repairing the freeze-damaged condensers despite the relatively small price tag. It's only circumstantial evidence that PTOI's pyrolysis isn't any better than regular pyrolysis...but there sure is a lot of that evidence.
I think you're right, Commando911, I think Mr. Heddle will exit. I'm sure even long-time investors realize that Mr. Bordynuik is highly dishonest...but he can sure pump a stock and that's exactly what investors want right now. Investors seem to want to be fleeced again as a group because each thinks they will individually come out ahead.
As far as your statement that deals take time...there's always an actual non-time obstacle and investors should press Mr. Heddle for answers on what obstacles remain before an actual sale can be realized and a timeline for when those obstacle(s) will be overcome. Right now the reason seems to be that nobody wants to buy a processor...which once again says investors should press Mr. Heddle for any evidence that there's any sort of a value proposition which could even remotely convince a potential customer to buy/lease a processor or even ship plastic to PTOI's facility.