Quote:I don't see your buddy posting about SFRX, and I am certain he would if he was legally able to do so.
Yet SFRX filed a contempt complaint saying he was posting and caused irreparable harm.
You need to read Judge Cook's ruling once again. I know Huffmanhas convinced Kyle.....we got this, but no competent evidence was provided prior to signing the sham stipulation.
The Judge accepted the Defendant's consent not to post, but said the following....
Quote:The Court has a duty to administer justice and cannot in good conscience rubber stamp that portion of the motion for Consent Final Judgment at this time absent an evidentiary hearing and proof of entitlement to such damages.
She ORDERED evidence be presented and SFRX has to prove entitlement to damages.
The ONLY damages SFRX has claimed is shareholder losses.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/279243584/Judge-Cook-s-ORDER
Now they have until 5 pm today to provide me with proof of the four items I asked for, and I will gladly apologize and make any corrections.
Otherwise they can prove it to a Court if they like. I won't sign a stipulation and they can spent 100's of thousands of dollars if they like trying to prove their case.
Psst....you don't have to correct something that's true. I need proof of an 80/20 and "3 items". The permit issued doesn't mention either.
Nor does Sinclair research design mention coins or the Captain's wife. And since they got the permit July 28, 2014 and filed the lawsuit on Sept 3, 2014, just hours before you posted this.....
Quote:83. In actuality to the above portion of the post, there was readily available information to V******** that there was treasure in the form of actual coins from such wreck that is the subject of such site. As a matter of fact, it was one of SEAFARER’s actual archaeologists who made recoveries on such site. And in fact there were three platters that were found on such site, which included the name of the wife of the very Captain of the ship being pursued. All such matters are were publicly available from the State of Florida records that were publicly available. The site in issue is a known site, far removed from the falsities that V********* posts.
http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1953162
It amazes me why Kyle wouldn't have PR'd this (ahem) new information you claim exist per some "alleged" conversation with Sinclair.
Can't you guys get anything in writing.
I prefer the "written word", and thought you did too. It seems if this was readily available, as Hu1 says, it would be readily available on this board or Ihub.
But it's not.
Tick tock, see you before 5 o'clock?
2
1
