PSGR....Merry Christmas and/or Happy Holidays to a
Post# of 1537
Posted On: 12/21/2015 7:47:37 AM
PSGR....Merry Christmas and/or Happy Holidays to all. Wishing everyone only the best for the coming year.
As December draws to a close, a quick review of the PSGR year does not lend itself to be considered a year of comfort and joy. IN MY OPINION, Corporate Pershing Resources has not fulfilled its promises to keep the investor informed with timely and accurate information. The investor is left with a feeling that Pershing Resources is playing a game of Hide and Seek. No matter how often the investor requests (seeks) information from Pershing, the response (more accurately: LACK of response) is a non-response. I have heard from a few investors who took the time to research the links from my prior post about historical data. There appears to be a consensus that the prior activities of MG, XENOLIX etc (all prior names for Pershing Resources) closely resemble the current image of Pershing Resources. I know that some people within corporate Pershing Resources do read comments made on these pages. I have not heard from any of them. I fully expected a clarification and/or rebuttal to the similarities (again, referencing the links thst were posted) between prior company name questionable activities. There have been no responses from anyone at Pershing Resources.
I am hopeful for positive changes from Pershing Resources in 2016 BUT the past year has mirrored previous iterations of Pershing Resources. One can presume that there will be little change. The only change that has been consistent with this corporation is the name is changed whenever business questions arise.
Again, I ask that readers respond by posting their thoughts on this board OR you can PM me from the header.
As December draws to a close, a quick review of the PSGR year does not lend itself to be considered a year of comfort and joy. IN MY OPINION, Corporate Pershing Resources has not fulfilled its promises to keep the investor informed with timely and accurate information. The investor is left with a feeling that Pershing Resources is playing a game of Hide and Seek. No matter how often the investor requests (seeks) information from Pershing, the response (more accurately: LACK of response) is a non-response. I have heard from a few investors who took the time to research the links from my prior post about historical data. There appears to be a consensus that the prior activities of MG, XENOLIX etc (all prior names for Pershing Resources) closely resemble the current image of Pershing Resources. I know that some people within corporate Pershing Resources do read comments made on these pages. I have not heard from any of them. I fully expected a clarification and/or rebuttal to the similarities (again, referencing the links thst were posted) between prior company name questionable activities. There have been no responses from anyone at Pershing Resources.
I am hopeful for positive changes from Pershing Resources in 2016 BUT the past year has mirrored previous iterations of Pershing Resources. One can presume that there will be little change. The only change that has been consistent with this corporation is the name is changed whenever business questions arise.
Again, I ask that readers respond by posting their thoughts on this board OR you can PM me from the header.
(0)
(0)