Truth,
Please allow me to preface what I'm about to say by pointing out, this is all my opinion. I don't claim to have all the answers and probably have very few if any at all. So while we may agree on some points, no doubt we'll have some differences on others. I'll try and keep it brief and respond to each question/point as referenced in your post
1. The 100 films in 15-30 days. You're right, they have one or two more days to get it done. I don't think this would even be an issue at all if it wasn't for their documented track record. I can't stress this enough to you and anyone else reading this, if a company in the OTC wants to be taken seriously, Prove It! Start with your shareholders as they are the lifeblood of the company.
Truth, when money is on the line my brother, people react differently but most don't like being told one thing only to later find out something different.
2. I couldn't disagree with you more on this point. Credibility is at stake here. It's the very foundation that we need to get us from OTC to NASDAQ. Whether you like it or not, it all starts with the shareholders. Without credibility, a company is destined to fail.
3. Do you recall in my last post the phrase, "pie in the sky"? I have it, you have it and many if not all of us who invest in OTC have it. My point is, it's imperative to temper that with reality. That being said, I hope you're correct and in fact think you are indeed correct when you say "SOMETHING WAY BIGGER may be going on". Nevertheless, when credibility comes into question and money is on the line skepticism will rule the day. Is it right? Is it fair in this case? I don't know but I do know neither you nor I can change that. Only NTEK can and I believe will but until that time try to be a little more understanding when you see skepticism. To be clear, I'm not lumping bashers in with skeptics. I'm sure you and most who have read my posts know, I have no respect whatsoever for shitheads whose sole motivation is to enrich themselves through personal attacks and lies. I can't tell you enough how much that bothers me.
In summation, the CEO gains much needed credibility with his shareholders if he is true to his word. Think of it this way Truth, if he did what he said, no one (except the shithead bashers) would be bitchin'. Ya know what I mean jellybean?
Atlas1
NTEK...GET SUMMM!!!
Please allow me to preface what I'm about to say by pointing out, this is all my opinion. I don't claim to have all the answers and probably have very few if any at all. So while we may agree on some points, no doubt we'll have some differences on others. I'll try and keep it brief and respond to each question/point as referenced in your post
1. The 100 films in 15-30 days. You're right, they have one or two more days to get it done. I don't think this would even be an issue at all if it wasn't for their documented track record. I can't stress this enough to you and anyone else reading this, if a company in the OTC wants to be taken seriously, Prove It! Start with your shareholders as they are the lifeblood of the company.
Truth, when money is on the line my brother, people react differently but most don't like being told one thing only to later find out something different.
2. I couldn't disagree with you more on this point. Credibility is at stake here. It's the very foundation that we need to get us from OTC to NASDAQ. Whether you like it or not, it all starts with the shareholders. Without credibility, a company is destined to fail.
3. Do you recall in my last post the phrase, "pie in the sky"? I have it, you have it and many if not all of us who invest in OTC have it. My point is, it's imperative to temper that with reality. That being said, I hope you're correct and in fact think you are indeed correct when you say "SOMETHING WAY BIGGER may be going on". Nevertheless, when credibility comes into question and money is on the line skepticism will rule the day. Is it right? Is it fair in this case? I don't know but I do know neither you nor I can change that. Only NTEK can and I believe will but until that time try to be a little more understanding when you see skepticism. To be clear, I'm not lumping bashers in with skeptics. I'm sure you and most who have read my posts know, I have no respect whatsoever for shitheads whose sole motivation is to enrich themselves through personal attacks and lies. I can't tell you enough how much that bothers me.
In summation, the CEO gains much needed credibility with his shareholders if he is true to his word. Think of it this way Truth, if he did what he said, no one (except the shithead bashers) would be bitchin'. Ya know what I mean jellybean?
Atlas1
NTEK...GET SUMMM!!!
