Kat, We have been over this ground before. You
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 06/19/2015 5:16:32 PM
Kat,
We have been over this ground before. Your experience, while admirable, has not been with public companies and I believe your experience has limited applicability. From where I stand, without Bret, we would have all been sold down the river in 2007 when prior management was looking to spin off all relevant assets to a new shell company. Bret stepped up and has been leading this company at a great personal sacrifice. Is it a high risk venture? Yes. Do I wish the traded value was higher? Yes. Are there substantial forces aligned against the company, some of whom are involved in illicit dealings? I believe so. There are paid bashers on multple boards, the company knows the IP addresses of them, and then there are the plain wackos who have personal vendettas against other shareholders. Else..what would an interesting day be in nano-board-land? Eh?
I just haven't seen you add anything substantive to the discussion during the 5 years during which I've been a shareholder. I don't see how your whining is helpful. We will have to agree to disagree. I, for one, would not support your attempt to replace Bret nor the BOD. Nor, I suspect, would the majority of longs.
We have been over this ground before. Your experience, while admirable, has not been with public companies and I believe your experience has limited applicability. From where I stand, without Bret, we would have all been sold down the river in 2007 when prior management was looking to spin off all relevant assets to a new shell company. Bret stepped up and has been leading this company at a great personal sacrifice. Is it a high risk venture? Yes. Do I wish the traded value was higher? Yes. Are there substantial forces aligned against the company, some of whom are involved in illicit dealings? I believe so. There are paid bashers on multple boards, the company knows the IP addresses of them, and then there are the plain wackos who have personal vendettas against other shareholders. Else..what would an interesting day be in nano-board-land? Eh?
I just haven't seen you add anything substantive to the discussion during the 5 years during which I've been a shareholder. I don't see how your whining is helpful. We will have to agree to disagree. I, for one, would not support your attempt to replace Bret nor the BOD. Nor, I suspect, would the majority of longs.
(0)
(0)