All that for me?? I actually agree with a coupl
Post# of 43064
I actually agree with a couple of things you said and on one other point I feel I need to reiterate.
Your comment: "I think he’s suggesting here that the management team at PTOI, in addition to creating, assembling, developing, and testing the processor, is also supposed to know exactly how to adapt their processor to very specific (and diverse) customers’ needs, locations, and feedstocks, and also know of all the potential customers and industries that the processor could be used by."
I think you're right and that's exactly what's happening now. PTOI is shopping around for customers to buy a processor and I'm sure that will require customization which will certainly take even more time, engineering and money. Usually after I've seen a company blow through $68M, I would expect them to have already identified at least one useful application for which the process already works...but that's me. I understand we don't think the same way. You believe more work is required so you won't be bothered if the company announces more development is needed in this never-ending 'progress'.
And as far as the math...the math works--you don't believe it though. That's fine. That's why you're invested and I'm not. All I'm advocating is that PTOI (and this applies to every single penny stock scam I've run across as well) provide evidence of value to investors...or that investors press for answers. You don't believe my math...but you believe the company's process has value without seeing any math. Maybe you just hate math.
So as soon as OBG 'validates' PTOI's technology for custom projects and does the necessary engineering work, then will you be rich?
Personally I think you just gave Mr. Heddle a new idea for his next press release of 'progress but further delay'.