You choose to recall Gerald saying he would partia

Quote:

---

You choose to recall Gerald saying he would partially use the extra billion shares to acquire new assets, but you choose to forget him promising non-dilutive financing, increasing shareholder value in the near term, up listing by year end, Lympro revenue to change the math, etc, etc, etc.

---

Gerald didn't promise anything. He said they would seek non-dilutive funding. They hired Randy Grimes to work on Grants. To date nothing has come of that. I don't know why, and neither does anyone else. We don't know if other sources of non-dilutive financing have been available or not. It could have been available, but under terms that were considered less favorable than using shares. I don't consider Gerald's statements as promises, and apparently you do and is the reason you're pissed off.

I don't have selective memory. I hear his statements about seeking non-dilutive funding, and also his statements about using shares for acquisitions, and understand that neither are promises as you seem to think. He's telling us their business goals. They may work out or they may not. If you are unable to make that distinction, you are in over your head with any shares in this investment. One should be able to weigh the claims of non-dilutive funding and funding acquisitions with shares and, if critical thinking is employed, conclude that it could be one, or the other, or some combination of both. You're clearly emotionally wrapped up in this investment and not able to think critically. Nothing was promised to you.

How many times are you going to continue to bring up my large stake as a reason I don't consider anything negative. You claim I have so much invested I can't do critical thinking. I've never heard anything more stupid. You come across as a jealous clown every time you post this nonsense.

You should stop referring to yourself as a long. You've sold most of your shares already in less than 2 years into the investment. Regardless of your original intentions, you're not a long.

You are frustrated. That's clear. You should refrain from speaking for other longs or claiming they are in denial. Just because your financial situation caused you to be forced to sell your shares before you intended to is not Gerald's fault. It's your fault. Man up and take responsibility for it. Perhaps you couldn't help the circumstances causing that, but still it's not Gerald's fault, and you continue to put all the blame on his from breaking his "promise" to you. Again, if you can't grasp that the planned route in business doesn't always work out they way they intend, you're in over your head by investing in individual stocks. If you believe Gerald has lied to us and continues to lie to us, and yet you choose to remain invested, and you advise your sons to remain invested, well... that speaks volumes for your ability to remain objective.

So please continue to blame Gerald for all of your misfortunes, and take no personal responsibility for anything. Continue to believe everyone with more invested than you can't be objective. I was reminded earlier today that I'm arguing with a brick. I've finally concluded they are correct.

I'll return to the other board where great DD is being done, where no one is crying over broken promises, where investors take ownership of the responsibility for their investment decisions.