I'm quoting Lea Pupura in the New Yorker: Most
Post# of 30067
Posted On: 03/19/2015 12:51:38 AM
.jpg)
I'm quoting Lea Pupura in the New Yorker:
Most coincidents are not
miraculous, but way more
common than we think—
it’s the shiver
of noticing being
central in a sequence
of events
that makes so much
seem wild and rare—
because what if it wasn’t?
Astonishment’s nothing
without your consent.
That gosh darn red candle on December 1 continues to bug me. That tiny ridiculous signal of trade for better or worse. If you look at any chart with a logarithmic axis, and you draw a line from the sept 2012 low through the bottom of that ridiculous candle you arrive almost precisely at this price, and this moment in time. If you believe in magic.
I believe TA is mostly useless. I was motivated by JP's excessively confident TA on the other board. blah. What I just suggested is just as possible, and right until proven otherwise.
Most coincidents are not
miraculous, but way more
common than we think—
it’s the shiver
of noticing being
central in a sequence
of events
that makes so much
seem wild and rare—
because what if it wasn’t?
Astonishment’s nothing
without your consent.
That gosh darn red candle on December 1 continues to bug me. That tiny ridiculous signal of trade for better or worse. If you look at any chart with a logarithmic axis, and you draw a line from the sept 2012 low through the bottom of that ridiculous candle you arrive almost precisely at this price, and this moment in time. If you believe in magic.
I believe TA is mostly useless. I was motivated by JP's excessively confident TA on the other board. blah. What I just suggested is just as possible, and right until proven otherwise.
(0)
(0)