"You must have missed this by accident:..." I c

"You must have missed this by accident:..."

I can see you really want that question answered and, although I've already been chastised for answering for another poster, I think I can safely say that by being right about PTOI every day for six years, SelfDocument did significantly better than a negative 95% return.

Although I'll also quickly point out that the stock price performance doesn't necessarily prove who's right or wrong despite PTOI's highly negative stock performance. If I took the stance that it does then I would have to also believe that the run up to $7.00 years ago proved PTOI was legitimate...rather than a penny stock being run up by a swindler by pushing grandiose fictitious stories onto what was effectively a tiny float. Instead it's better to wonder why the company can't produce results after six years and why the company refuses to disclose how well any processor actually performs after all this time.

Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.