https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1053368/00
Post# of 5570
Just something I was thinking about and wanted to share.
what if VS had financial investments in the company before he asked for payment of services he is currently providing for the business. Wouldnt it make sense to reduce risk and increase equity for the long term with a guaranteed payout to hedge the original debt incurred. To me if this is the case, it would make perfect sense for any CEO to make sure risk is neutralized. I seriously dont think this is for the reason of a small paycheck in the short term. Just saying....people may be jumping the gun feeding off of eachothers opinions and perception that things are wrong with a share increase and a CEO on the sky slopes collecting a paycheck while nobody knows what is going on behind the scences. And what is to say that a CEO paycheck wont mean reinvestment into the company. I seriously think everyone needs to chill out and remain with patience. Business take time to build especially if there is a business plan that involves very delicate and sensitive technology that is trending toward a market explosion.
I think long term thinking is required with MPIX, not lack of patience or emotional discipline.
It sucks not to know details all the time, but that can also mean security for all shareholders too. Just something to think about.
Mindpix Corporation (MPIX) Stock Research Links
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/